2017
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j4323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative safety of direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin in venous thromboembolism: multicentre, population based, observational study

Abstract: Objective To determine the safety of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use compared with warfarin use for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. Design Retrospective matched cohort study conducted between 1 January 2009 and 31 March 2016. Setting Community based, using healthcare data from six jurisdictions in Canada and the United States. Participants 59 525 adults (12 489 DOAC users; 47 036 warfarin users) with a new diagnosis of venous thromboembolism and a prescription for a DOAC or warfarin within 30 day… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
60
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies have shown that DOACs significantly reduce the risk of embolism, strokes and intracranial bleeding events while increasing Gi bleeding compared to VKA use (Table iii) [20][21][22][23]. However, a study published by Jun et al did not show any association of Gi bleeding with the use of DOACs [24].…”
Section: Direct Oral Anticoagulants (Doacs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have shown that DOACs significantly reduce the risk of embolism, strokes and intracranial bleeding events while increasing Gi bleeding compared to VKA use (Table iii) [20][21][22][23]. However, a study published by Jun et al did not show any association of Gi bleeding with the use of DOACs [24].…”
Section: Direct Oral Anticoagulants (Doacs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, they found similar efficacy for all DOACs in the prevention of recurrent VTE and a significant reduction in major bleeding; a finding which was consistent in those with moderate renal impairment (Van Es et al , ). Jun et al () undertook a real‐world observational study looking at the safety of DOACs versus warfarin within the first 90 days of VTE treatment. They looked at the subgroup of CKD, defined as an estimated GFR (eGFR) <60 ml/min/1·73 m 2 , and found no significant difference in major bleeding [HR 1·17(0·75–1·77)] or mortality [HR 0·68 (0·36–1·27)] however 95% of the patients on DOACs were prescribed rivaroxaban.…”
Section: Doac Use In Venous Thromboembolism With Coexisting Renal Impmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They looked at the subgroup of CKD, defined as an estimated GFR (eGFR) <60 ml/min/1·73 m 2 , and found no significant difference in major bleeding [HR 1·17(0·75–1·77)] or mortality [HR 0·68 (0·36–1·27)] however 95% of the patients on DOACs were prescribed rivaroxaban. So, this study is not necessarily representative of the DOACs as a class (Jun et al , ). Unfortunately, this study does not include information on VTE recurrence.…”
Section: Doac Use In Venous Thromboembolism With Coexisting Renal Impmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, bleeding‐averse anticoagulation continues to be a significant challenge. While some reports suggest improvement in bleeding consequences with DOACs as compared to VKAs, others suggest no major improvement . Another challenge with DOACs is the difficulty of achieving rapid reversal in incidences of excessive bleeding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%