1985
DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-21.2.144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Sensitivities of Diagnostic Procedures Used to Detect Bacterial Kidney Disease in Salmonid Fishes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with Evelyn et al (1981), Cipriano et al (1985), Benediktsdottir et al ( 1 991) and Gudmundsdottir et al (1991), our findings showed that culture can be used to demonstrate bacteria in fish with no external or internal signs of disease, i.e. the so-called latent carriers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In agreement with Evelyn et al (1981), Cipriano et al (1985), Benediktsdottir et al ( 1 991) and Gudmundsdottir et al (1991), our findings showed that culture can be used to demonstrate bacteria in fish with no external or internal signs of disease, i.e. the so-called latent carriers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Several studies have also shown culture to be a very sensitive method for detecting R.s. but other investigations have shown certain serological methods to be superior to culture with regard to sensitivity (Cipriano et al 1985, Pascho et al 1987, Sakai et al 1987, Gudmundsdottir et al 1990). Our results showed that culture can fail to confirm a suspicion of BKD based on internal findings, especially in fish that are externally 'healthy looking'.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although studies comparing R. salmoninarum detection methods continue to be reported as new diagnostic tests are introduced, 6,10,19,28,38,42 very few have included ovarian fluid as the test sample. 12,25,30,33 This is the first comparative study to provide strong evidence that R. salmoninarum may be present in ovarian fluids thought to be free of the bacterium on the basis of 2 standard diagnostic methods, the MF-FAT and the ELISA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, many workers have preferred to diagnose BKD directly by the use of various techniques, predominantly serological, on fish extracts. Serological techniques have included the direct or indirect fluorescent antibody test (FAT) (BULLOCK and STUCKEY 1975;BULLOCK et al 1980), immunodiffusion (ID) (CHEN et al 1974;KIMURA et al 1978), staphylococcal coagglutination (CoA) (KIMURA 1978), and counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIE) (CIPRIANO et al 1985). However, in a comparative study, isolation of R. salmoninarum in culture was found to be more sensitive than FAT or ID (EVELYN 1978) and although CIPRIANO et al (1985) reported that isolation in culture was less sensitivie than CIE or CoA, those authors stated that primary isolation followed by serological identification was the most reliable method for the detection of R .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%