1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1996.tb03611.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative sensitivity of indirect immunofluorescence to immunoblot assay for the detection of circulating antibodies to bullous pemphigoid antigens 1 and 2

Abstract: The sera of 263 patients with bullous pemphigoid (BP) were tested by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on salt-split skin (SSS) and immunoblot (IB) assay, in order to assess the diagnostic sensitivity of these techniques. Among the 263 sera tested, 198 sera (75%) contained antibasement membrane zone antibodies demonstrable by IIF reacting to the epidermal (98%) or both the dermal and epidermal sides (2%) of SSS. One hundred and eighty-two of the 263 sera (69%) reacted by IB with BP antigens (Ag), most commonly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…17 Serological techniques (mainly immunochemical) are not very sensitive, especially for non-BP subepidermal AIBDs. 25 Anti-BMZ antibodies are detectable in 70% of patients with BP, 20% of those with CP, and 50% of those with EBA, [25][26][27][28][29][30] and by immunoblotting and/or indirect immunofluorescence on salt-split skin in 80% to 85%. 28,31 When standard indirect immunofluorescence is negative, they are detectable in only 45% of these cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Serological techniques (mainly immunochemical) are not very sensitive, especially for non-BP subepidermal AIBDs. 25 Anti-BMZ antibodies are detectable in 70% of patients with BP, 20% of those with CP, and 50% of those with EBA, [25][26][27][28][29][30] and by immunoblotting and/or indirect immunofluorescence on salt-split skin in 80% to 85%. 28,31 When standard indirect immunofluorescence is negative, they are detectable in only 45% of these cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dermal-epidermal junction was separated by 1 M NaCl containing 50 M phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 0.1 M EDTA (10).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a rapid and reliable differentiation between these diseases is also required for multicenter studies, especially epidemiological studies and therapeutic trials [18]. Indirect immunofluorescence using salt-split skin has been proposed to identify BP, CP and EBA, since most BP patients have circulating antibodies that bind the epidermal side of salt-split skin, whereas autoantibodies from patients with EBA bind to the dermal side [19, 20]. However, this simple technique cannot be considered as the gold standard diagnostic test since: (i) many patients with CP or EBA have no circulating antibodies [20, 21, 22]and (ii) a dual labeling of both the dermal and epidermal sides of salt-split skin may be observed with both BP and CP sera [23, 24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%