2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative shielding properties of some tellurite glasses: Part 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the graphs of Z eff values for all samples have discontinuities due to photoelectric absorption near the K-, L-, and M-absorption edges of some elements at low energies (see Table 4). These results are in good agreement with the results for various glass systems obtained by El-Mallawany et al [34], Kaur et al [35], and Chanthima and Kaewkhao [36] and with the results for several smart polymer materials reported by Sayyed [37].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We note that the graphs of Z eff values for all samples have discontinuities due to photoelectric absorption near the K-, L-, and M-absorption edges of some elements at low energies (see Table 4). These results are in good agreement with the results for various glass systems obtained by El-Mallawany et al [34], Kaur et al [35], and Chanthima and Kaewkhao [36] and with the results for several smart polymer materials reported by Sayyed [37].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results (dependent of µ/ρ on the photon energy) are corresponding with the recently published literature on different materials like rocks [44], glasses [46][47][48][49][50], bricks [51], and amino acids [52]. Comparison with other glasses; like tellurite glasses [53][54][55] could be suggested.…”
Section: Reflection Loss (R L ) and Optical Transmission (T)supporting
confidence: 87%
“…The Z eff values of the studied glasses were compared with different promising tellurite glasses in table 2. It is clear that the Z eff values of the studied glasses are higher than those of 90TeO 2 -10V 2 O 5 [29] and 60TeO 2 -10B 2 O 3 -10MoO 3 -10ZnO-10Na 2 O [30]. On the other hand, the Z eff values of the studied glasses are lower than those of 90TeO 2 -10Bi 2 O 3 [26], and comparable with those of 80TeO 2 -20BaO [27].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…By the incresing of the photon energy the MFP values increase very fast, so in the shielding applications it is better to increase the thickness of the glass because the gamma-ray can penetrate the glass more deeply. Moreover, figure 6 reveals that the present glasses have better shelding properties than those of Ti2V48Te50 glass [29], lower than those of Pb20Te80 [7] glass and comparable with those of Mn20Te80 [34] and Mo20B10Te70 glasses [19].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%