Comparative Sociology of Law: Legal Fields, Legal Scholarships, and Social Sciences in Europe and the United States

Abstract

This article attempts to gain a better understanding of the sociology(ies) of law in a comparative perspective through a structural and comparative explanation of the American and the French legal fields. It is argued that comparative sociology of law will not be able to explain the difference among countries, scholars, movements, and schools of thought in short, it will not be able to compare-as long as it avoids the analysis of some social and cultural presuppositions related to the context in which these differences take place. It focuses mainly on two of these presuppositions. First, legal fields, with their history, their internal structure, and their power relations, and second the type of relation between the legal field and the state. The empirical examination provided in this article explicitly seeks to offer insights for the reconstruction of Bourdieu's structural theory of the legal field.

From the Constitution to the Classroom: Educational Freedom in Antwerp’s Ultra-Orthodox Jewish Schools

“…Law and society scholars describe how the agents who participate in the formulation, interpretation, and implementation of the law may make competing claims of authority and fight for the chance to have the final say regarding its meaning and scope (García-Villegas, 2006;Talesh, 2009;Tamanaha, 2008). The strong, inevitable, linkages between education policy and politics (Apple, 1990;Beyer & Apple, 1998;Bowls & Gintis, 1976;Giroux, 2001) may exacerbate these struggles, deepen the conflicts between the competing legal narratives, and transform their impact in society.…”

Legal Mobilization on the Terrain of the State: Creating a Field of Immigrant Rights Lawyering in France and the United States

“…By contrast, in France, there is argued to be a much closer relationship between the juridical field and the state. During France's Third Republic, law faculties and the Conseil d'État successfully presented themselves as “those who possess the savoir d'État (knowledge of the state),” while the liberal profession never acquired comparable political influence (Garcia‐Villegas 2006, 369). Lawyers have at times played significant roles in the French state as elected legislators, but the profession itself has never exercised comparable political influence to the US corporate bar (Karpik 1999).…”

Trafficking in Law: Cause Lawyer, Bureaucratic State and Rights of Human Trafficking Victims in Thailand

“…They are unfamiliar with policymaking under broad common law or constitutional mandates. Litigation to make new policy is far less common in the civil law world (Garcia-Villegas, 2006). Finally, as Thailand has never ceased to be a Kingdom, the moral force of the monarchy, patronclient relationships and other customary relationships makes establishing the authority of law more complex.…”