1994
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.280610109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative sorption kinetic studies of phenolic compounds on fly ash and impregnated fly ash

Abstract: The factors affecting the rate processes involved in the removal of phenolic compounds, e.g. initial phenol concentration, particle size, impregnation of fly ash (IFA), pH and temperature have been studied. The removal rate of phenols varied in the order p‐nitrophenol m‐nitrophenol > o‐nitrophenol > p‐cresol > phenol > m‐cresol > o‐cresol. The process followed first order rate kinetics. The sorption data generally fit the Lagergren equation and the intraparticle diffusion rate equation from which adsorption ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
60
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the case of the sorption of Acid Brilliant Blue, Direct Red 12 B, chromium(VI) and lead(II) onto biogas residual slurry 35,44 46 , the rate constant is dependent on concentration and particle size. For the sorption of phenolic compounds on¯y ash and impregnated¯y ash 39 the rate constant is dependent on concentration and temperature. Diffusional mass transport models applied to sorption systems have not been reviewed in this paper, but their role is extremely important particularly in processes where ion exchange and ionic bonding are not as prevalent as in chemisorption processes.…”
Section: Analysis Of Data From the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the case of the sorption of Acid Brilliant Blue, Direct Red 12 B, chromium(VI) and lead(II) onto biogas residual slurry 35,44 46 , the rate constant is dependent on concentration and particle size. For the sorption of phenolic compounds on¯y ash and impregnated¯y ash 39 the rate constant is dependent on concentration and temperature. Diffusional mass transport models applied to sorption systems have not been reviewed in this paper, but their role is extremely important particularly in processes where ion exchange and ionic bonding are not as prevalent as in chemisorption processes.…”
Section: Analysis Of Data From the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of phenol adsorbed shows a declining trend with higher as well as with lower pH, with maximum removal of phenol (up to almost 100 % by both the adsorbents) at neutral pH (Figure 2). This reduction of phenol-sorption may be because of the suppression by hydrogen ions (at lower pH), and hydroxyl ions (at higher pH) in addition to formation of various phenolic compounds at both acidic and alkaline conditions [16,17]. Figure 3 shows the effect of contact time on the removal of phenol by HIC and CAC.…”
Section: Effect Of Ph On Phenol Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, commercially available activated carbons are very expensive [7][8][9]. Therefore, studies are now focusing on new natural adsorbents with low cost and local availability, such as chitosan, bentonite, zeolite, clay minerals, olive mill residue, flay ashes, coal, rice husk, waste tea leaves, peanut hull pellets and bio sorbents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%