2015
DOI: 10.1080/21565503.2015.1102153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative strength of women's movements over time: conceptual, empirical, and theoretical innovations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence around the globe indicates the path for women to hold elected office was achieved not only through the efforts of individuals but with collective work through organizations. As identified by Mazur et al ( 2016 ), participants in the women's movement, including individuals and groups, both informal and formal, are those who identify with women as a group, and are framed as women representing women whose ideas are expressed as overtly gendered. Beckwith ( 2000 ) viewed women's movements as a subset of sociopolitical movements focusing on women's gendered experiences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Evidence around the globe indicates the path for women to hold elected office was achieved not only through the efforts of individuals but with collective work through organizations. As identified by Mazur et al ( 2016 ), participants in the women's movement, including individuals and groups, both informal and formal, are those who identify with women as a group, and are framed as women representing women whose ideas are expressed as overtly gendered. Beckwith ( 2000 ) viewed women's movements as a subset of sociopolitical movements focusing on women's gendered experiences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social clubs for women existed in the nineteenth century, but toward the end of the century an increasing number of women's groups began to form with political leanings. According to Mazur et al ( 2016 ), it was not until the early 2000s that scholars started having a consensus on the meaning of women's movements for comparative purposes (Molyneux, 1985 ; Beckwith, 2000 ). Although, women's movements were treated by many early feminist scholars, such as Dahlerup ( 1986 ), Katzenstein and Mueller ( 1987 ), Ferree and Martin ( 1995 ), as a major analytical focus or variable; they tried to understand how changes in the nature of women's movements have influenced policy outcomes and in turn how these activities have affected the movements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the wealth of comparative social movement research either neglects gender dimensions of contentious action (Kriesi, Koopmans, Duyvendak, & Guigni, 1995;McAdam, McCarthy, & Zald, 1996;McAdam, Tarrow, & Tilly, 2001) or is solely concerned with the strategies and success of women's movements (Banazak et. al., 2003;Beckwith, 2013;Katzenstein & McClurg Mueller, 1987;Mazur, McBride, & Hoard, 2016). Women's participation in protests outside of women's movements is yet under-researched and therefore our paper contributes to cutting edge research on gender in social movements.…”
Section: Introduction and Overviewmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In an assessment of movement strength, these three scholars have privileged the concepts of mobilisation or the ability of women's movement actors to accumulate "assets through participation of women as activists outside the state to further movement discourse and policy goals in a variety of formal and informal structures" (Mazur, McBride, and Hoard 2016). The same scholars, Mazur, McBride and Hoard also measure institutionalisation to assess women's movement strength.…”
Section: Women's Movementsmentioning
confidence: 99%