1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf00169550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative studies on the anorectic activity of d-fenfluramine in mice, rats, and guinea pigs

Abstract: The present study compares the anorectic activity of d-fenfluramine and its metabolite d-norfenfluramine in three animal species. d-Fenfluramine and d-norfenfluramine show anorectic activity at increasing doses (ED50) in rats, guinea pigs, and mice, d-norfenfluramine being more active than d-fenfluramine in all three species. Equiactive anorectic activities are reached with different brain levels of d-fenfluramine and d-norfenfluramine, guinea pigs being the most sensitive species, followed by rats then mice. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This explanation is supported by receptor binding experiments. Fenfluramine is metabolized in vivo to norfenfluramine, which has an affinity for 5-HT 2A receptors of 0.3 M (Mennini et al 1991). This concentration is similar to the potency with which both fenfluramine and norfenfluramine produce 5-HT release in in vitro experiments in synaptosomes (Gobbi et al 1998) suggesting that norfenfluramine will occupy a significant fraction of 5-HT 2A receptors at these concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…This explanation is supported by receptor binding experiments. Fenfluramine is metabolized in vivo to norfenfluramine, which has an affinity for 5-HT 2A receptors of 0.3 M (Mennini et al 1991). This concentration is similar to the potency with which both fenfluramine and norfenfluramine produce 5-HT release in in vitro experiments in synaptosomes (Gobbi et al 1998) suggesting that norfenfluramine will occupy a significant fraction of 5-HT 2A receptors at these concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The effect of fenfluramine in our study could have been caused by direct binding of this drug to the 5-HT 1A receptor; however, this is not very likely since the affinity of fenfluramine for the 5-HT 1A receptor is very low (mM range) (Mennini et al, 1991). Furthermore, the pharmacological treatments may have affected nonspecific binding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…One alternative interpretation we recognized is that fenfluramine has a direct competitive effect on [ 11 C]AZ10419369 receptor binding. The in the literature reported 5-HT 1A and 5-HT 1B receptor affinity of fenfluramine are, however, in the micro molar range (Mennini et al, 1991). In addition, fenfluramine was reported not to influence the 5-HT 1A receptor binding of the antagonist radioligand […”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%