2016
DOI: 10.4103/1687-7934.178873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study between the effect of sevoflurane and ketamine-midazolam on the cardiac troponin I level and hemodynamic variables in pediatric therapeutic cardiac catheterization for pulmonic stenosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 Eldeen and Messeha reported that sevoflurane was a better anesthetic than ketamine and midazolam for children with PS undergoing cardiac catheterization because it caused less myocardial damage and ensured better hemodynamic stability. 15 Also, Rivenes et al demonstrated that the use of sevoflurane at various concentrations-imposed stability of the hemodynamic and cardiac index parameters during cardiac catheterization. 16 In children with ventricular septal defect, Han et al reported an initial increase followed by a quick heart rate and arterial pressure decline with ketamine injection intramuscularly, reflecting significant, adverse variations in hemodynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Eldeen and Messeha reported that sevoflurane was a better anesthetic than ketamine and midazolam for children with PS undergoing cardiac catheterization because it caused less myocardial damage and ensured better hemodynamic stability. 15 Also, Rivenes et al demonstrated that the use of sevoflurane at various concentrations-imposed stability of the hemodynamic and cardiac index parameters during cardiac catheterization. 16 In children with ventricular septal defect, Han et al reported an initial increase followed by a quick heart rate and arterial pressure decline with ketamine injection intramuscularly, reflecting significant, adverse variations in hemodynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%