1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf00253101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study in mice of the toxicity, pharmacology, and therapeutic activity of daunorubicin-DNA and doxorubicin-DNA complexes

Abstract: We have compared the toxicologic, pharmacologic, and therapeutic properties of the DNA complexes of daunorubicin and doxorubicin, after intravenous (IV) administration into mice. The overall toxicity of doxorubicin is significantly reduced after IV injection as a DNA complex while daunorubicin-DNA is as toxic as free daunorubicin. On hemopoietic stem cells, daunorubicin-DNA was found to be more cytotoxic than daunorubicin, while the opposite was observed with doxorubicin and doxorubicin-DNA. Both complexes are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3b). The data confirm that Dox-CBMVs can be internalized by cells and that the cell-killing ability of Dox-CBMVs works by acting on the nucleus which is consistent with the mechanism of free Dox (i.e., intercalating with the DNA in the cellular nucleus) [22][23][24]. Further flow cytometric data displays that the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CT26.WT cells treated by Dox-CBMVs was significantly lower than that of the cells treated by free Dox (Fig.…”
Section: Dox-cbmvs Have the Cancer Cell-killing Ability By Entering Csupporting
confidence: 79%
“…3b). The data confirm that Dox-CBMVs can be internalized by cells and that the cell-killing ability of Dox-CBMVs works by acting on the nucleus which is consistent with the mechanism of free Dox (i.e., intercalating with the DNA in the cellular nucleus) [22][23][24]. Further flow cytometric data displays that the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CT26.WT cells treated by Dox-CBMVs was significantly lower than that of the cells treated by free Dox (Fig.…”
Section: Dox-cbmvs Have the Cancer Cell-killing Ability By Entering Csupporting
confidence: 79%
“…To this end, here we report a combined chemoimmunotherapy using a plasmid−doxorubicin complex. Although it is reported that doxorubicin complexed to salmon sperm DNA is less toxic than the free drug and is effective against leukemia, there was no consideration in terms of immune modulation at that time presumably due to lack of immune stimulation by the DNA carrier . Both the plasmid with unmethylated CpG motifs as a TLR9 agonist and doxorubicin as a TLR4 agonist are the subjects of this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dox molecules begin to be released; (2) the cavity of the cis-ring becomes completely hydrophilic and the remaining Dox molecules are forced out of the ring; (3) ATP is hydrolyzed to ADP; (4) ATP bound to the trans-ring of GroEL begins a process analogous to Step 1; (5) the second ring becomes fully hydrophilic, releasing the remaining Dox molecules; (6) ATP is hydrolyzed. When Dox is excited by orange light (508 nm), it emits a red fluorescence. , However, when fluorescent molecules are tightly packed together, their fluorescence signals can be quenched. According to this principle, we expected that when Dox is released from the cavity of GroEL, we would observe an increase in fluorescence. We first tested this by treating GroEL–Dox with SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%