2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of bioelectricity generation in a microbial fuel cell using ceramic membranes made of ceramic powder, Kalporgan's soil, and acid leached Kalporgan's soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cheraghipoor et al. 2019 [40] also reported that membranes made of leached Kalporgan's soil (LKS) with 4.52% of Fe 2 O 3 allowed them to improve the power performance of their cylindrical double-chamber MFCs up to 42 times compared with the system working with membranes based on commercial ceramic powder containing 2.92% of iron, which is in line with the results obtained in the present work.…”
Section: Results and Discusionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Cheraghipoor et al. 2019 [40] also reported that membranes made of leached Kalporgan's soil (LKS) with 4.52% of Fe 2 O 3 allowed them to improve the power performance of their cylindrical double-chamber MFCs up to 42 times compared with the system working with membranes based on commercial ceramic powder containing 2.92% of iron, which is in line with the results obtained in the present work.…”
Section: Results and Discusionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Rajesh et al reported that PCMs play a significant role in enhancing the MFC stability, which can enhance the columbic efficiency and give a better environment to the microbes. In a similar set of studies, Marzieh et al used two different types of powder, a commercial ceramic powder and a native soil from Kalporgan villages, to prepare the ceramic membrane. They reported that the use of kalporgan soil as a separator material decreases the cost of MFCs compared to other separators reported in the literature. ,, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses of Coulombic efficiency in MFCs across various studies have revealed notable differences influenced by operational parameters, electrode configurations, and membrane materials. For instance, in the study by Cheraghipoor et al, a significant increase in CE, from 53% to 83%, was observed when shifting from an MFC using a Nafion membrane to one employing a ceramic membrane derived from leached soil [98]. Similarly, investigations conducted by Das et al showed higher CE values for specific MFC setups, with MFC-B achieving a CE of 10.2 ± 1.3%, representing a 34% improvement compared to MFC-N (7.6 ± 1.0%) and a 70% enhancement relative to MFC-A (6.0 ± 1.0%) [101].…”
Section: Coulombic Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 96%