2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11164-018-3484-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of bis-chelate M(II) complexes (M = Ni, Cu, Zn) as new heterogeneous photocatalysts for degradation of methylene blue under visible light

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…49 Meanwhile, Cu(II) and Ni(II) have different electronic congurations and geometries, which may also inuence the photocatalytic activity. 50,51 In addition, based on the good catalytic performance of complexes 1-2, the catalytic performance of 1-2 for methylene blue (MB) and methyl orange (MO) was measured. The experimental results are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Photocatalytic Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49 Meanwhile, Cu(II) and Ni(II) have different electronic congurations and geometries, which may also inuence the photocatalytic activity. 50,51 In addition, based on the good catalytic performance of complexes 1-2, the catalytic performance of 1-2 for methylene blue (MB) and methyl orange (MO) was measured. The experimental results are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Photocatalytic Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the porous heterogeneous photocatalysts, their excellent photocatalytic performance is usually determined by the large specific surface area. , This is also true for the open-AEDTE-H 2 TIPP-POP with the biggest specific surface area, which exhibits the most prominent catalytic behavior among the series of polymers. The TON (74) of open-AEDTE-H 2 TIPP-POP as a heterogeneous photocatalyst is much better than that for the excellent photocatalysts, including Eosin Y (TON, 42) and potassium 2-formylphenolate (TON, 6.5). , For the two metalated polymers with similar surface areas, the photocatalytic performance of open-AEDTE-FeTIPP-POP is slightly better than that of open-AEDTE-ZnTIPP-POP because of the paramagnetic ions, which is helpful for the electron-transfer involving photocatalytic activity. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…56,57 For the two metalated polymers with similar surface areas, the photo- catalytic performance of open-AEDTE-FeTIPP-POP is slightly better than that of open-AEDTE-ZnTIPP-POP because of the paramagnetic ions, which is helpful for the electron-transfer involving photocatalytic activity. 58,59 The stability and popularity of the open-AEDTE-H 2 TIPP-POP as the best photocatalyst were also examined. Open-AEDTE-H 2 TIPP-POP was readily recovered from the reaction mixture via centrifugation.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%