1996
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.13.000046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of confocal and heterodyne microscopy for imaging through scattering media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…49,50 By combining with broad-band illumination, both confocal and coherence gating result. 36,51 This correlation e®ect of interference can also be used in a full-¯eld microscope ( Fig. 2(a)).…”
Section: Correlation Gatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49,50 By combining with broad-band illumination, both confocal and coherence gating result. 36,51 This correlation e®ect of interference can also be used in a full-¯eld microscope ( Fig. 2(a)).…”
Section: Correlation Gatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monte Carlo scattering simulations have been the method of choice for calculating the ability of various microscope configurations to filter out multiply-scattering light. A number of studies have indicated that for a conventional confocal microscope, a larger focusing NA leads to improved rejection of out-of-focus scattered light, thereby improving image contrast in thick tissues [22,23]. More recently, finite-difference time domain (FDTD) simulations have also been employed to study the interaction of light with scattering media in a confocal microscope [24].…”
Section: Conventional Confocal Endomicroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While OCT can achieve extremely high axial resolution [2], the transverse resolution is not sufficient to reveal cellular or subcellular features. Optical coherence microscopy (OCM) combines low coherence detection with conventional confocal microscopy to improve the transverse resolution of OCT images [3,4]. In confocal microscopy, a high numerical aperture (NA) optical design is essential to provide fine axial sectioning capability and reject unwanted light from out-of-focus regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confocal microscopy is therefore vulnerable to aberration and multiple scattering in biological specimens, which typically limits the imaging depth. In comparison, OCM significantly enhances the maximum imaging depth in scattering materials by improving rejection of scattered light using coherence gating, which also relaxes the constraint of extremely high NA optics required to obtain axial sectioning in confocal microscopy [3,4]. However, there still a trade off between the depth-of-focus (DOF) and transverse resolution in OCM images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%