2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.04.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of CuO supported on CeO2, Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 and Ce0.8Al0.2O2 based catalysts in the CO-PROX reaction

Abstract: Nanocrystalline supports, CeO 2 and solid solutions of modified CeO 2 with zirconium and aluminum were prepared by a freeze-drying method. CuO was supported by incipient wetness impregnation and calcination at 400 C. All catalysts exhibit high activity in the CO-PROX reaction and selectivity to CO 2 at low reaction temperature, being the catalyst supported on CeO 2 the more active and stable. The influence of the presence of CO 2 and H 2 O was also studied.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of zirconium in the support provokes an increasing of the Ce 3+ /Ce 4+ ratio on the surface of the catalyst that suggests that zirconium favors the presence of Ce 3+ [27].…”
Section: Xpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The presence of zirconium in the support provokes an increasing of the Ce 3+ /Ce 4+ ratio on the surface of the catalyst that suggests that zirconium favors the presence of Ce 3+ [27].…”
Section: Xpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the anode However, due to the high cost and limited availability the development of new catalytic systems more abundant and less expensive is necessary. In this sense, non-precious metal based catalysts are considered as promising alternatives and catalysts based on the closely interacting CuO-CeO 2 have been purposed as promising for the CO-PROX reaction for their high activity, selectivity and relatively low cost [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. For copper-ceria system, the establishment of an intimate contact between both components produces a promoting effect for ceria with fluorite-type structure, responsible of the high oxygen mobility [30,31] leading to both change in redox state capacity and bifunctional promotion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…TPR profile of CeCu exhibits three main reduction peaks at 130, 160, and 840 • C. The two low-temperature signals can be assigned to the reduction of CuO x species and surface Ce 4+ . It is well known that bulk CuO reduction takes place at around 315-380 • C [20,67,68] while in our material a shift to lower temperature of the CuO x reduction Catalysts 2017, 7, 28 5 of 13 features occurs due to metal support interaction. In addition, we can observe that the low reduction signal of ceria at around 525 • C is not present, indicating that the hydrogen spillover process promotes surface ceria reduction at a much lower temperature [67,70].…”
Section: Reduction Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The addition of Cu on ceria modifies the redox properties of both species, as a consequence of the CuO-CeO2 interaction at the oxide interface [59,[67][68][69]. TPR profile of CeCu exhibits three main reduction peaks at 130, 160, and 840 °C.…”
Section: Reduction Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%