2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2004.08.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of CWO and ZnSe(Te) scintillation detector on the performance of X-ray imaging system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are some physical parameters which are not included in the analytical method. Although optical transport was not modeled, previous studies have shown that optical transport has small impact on the performance of BGO, CWO and CsI within the thickness range investigated in this work (Zhao et al 2004, Kwak et al 2005, Wang et al 2009, Star-Lack et al 2015. The impact of patient scatter on imager signal and subsequently on CNR Au was not considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are some physical parameters which are not included in the analytical method. Although optical transport was not modeled, previous studies have shown that optical transport has small impact on the performance of BGO, CWO and CsI within the thickness range investigated in this work (Zhao et al 2004, Kwak et al 2005, Wang et al 2009, Star-Lack et al 2015. The impact of patient scatter on imager signal and subsequently on CNR Au was not considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CsI and BGO have been previously studied, as individual detectors, in MV imaging (Wang et al, 2009) as well as in kV (mainly CsI) (Zhao et al, 2004) with good performance across thicknesses ranging from 150 μ m to 4 cm. CWO was also studied for MV (Star-Lack et al, 2015) and kV imaging (Kwak et al, 2005) within a range of thicknesses up to 3 cm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid radiation damage, the photodiode arrays, which detect the optical photons emitted from the scintillator arrays, are placed to the sides of detector arrays, as schematically illustrated in figure 1(a). As a scintillation detector, a CdWO 4 crystal is a good candidate [2] because it shows reasonable properties required for this specific application with respect to density [3], effective atomic number [3], radiation damage [4], and optical transparency [5], although it suffers from low light yield, poor matching with the sensitivity curve of the photodiode, and toxicity [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their afterglow level after 10 ms is about three orders lower than that of CsI:Tl [3]. Scintillators based on ZnSe crystals are quite acceptable for use in X-ray introscopy detectors because their radiation stability is relatively good and their light output is about four times higher than the oxide scintillators (CdWO 4 , Bi 4 Ge 3 O 12 , Gd 2 SiO 5 ) used for similar purposes [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%