2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of data-driven and model-driven approaches in prediction of nuclear power plants operating parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To enhance forecast accuracy, researchers initially employed traditional models such as autoregressive integral moving average (ARIMA) [ 5 ] and support vector regression (SVR) [ 6 , 7 ] to explore nuclear power forecasting. In the following years, artificial neural networks (ANNs) [ 8 ], convolutional neural networks (CNNs) [ 9 ], recurrent neural networks (RNNs), long short-term memory networks (LSTMs), gated recurrent units (GRUs) [ 10 ], etc., along with their variants, were employed to improve prediction accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enhance forecast accuracy, researchers initially employed traditional models such as autoregressive integral moving average (ARIMA) [ 5 ] and support vector regression (SVR) [ 6 , 7 ] to explore nuclear power forecasting. In the following years, artificial neural networks (ANNs) [ 8 ], convolutional neural networks (CNNs) [ 9 ], recurrent neural networks (RNNs), long short-term memory networks (LSTMs), gated recurrent units (GRUs) [ 10 ], etc., along with their variants, were employed to improve prediction accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%