2014 13th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icmla.2014.84
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of Different Classification Techniques: Heart Disease Use Case

Abstract: Common stream mining tasks include classification, clustering and frequent pattern mining among them; data stream classification has drawn particular attention due to its vast real-time application. Through these applications, the main goal is to efficiently build classification models from data streams for accurate prediction. The development of such model has shown the need for machine learning techniques to be applied to large scale data. A range of machine learning techniques exists and the selection of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The test data points are then mapped into that same space and are classified based on which side of the margin they fall. [5].In [9], SVM performs the best with 85.7655% of correctly classified instance and in [10] SVM is used with boosting technique to give an accuracy of 84.81%. HoudaMezrigui et al have used SVM to attain a f-measure value of 93.5617 [11].…”
Section: B Support Vector Machinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The test data points are then mapped into that same space and are classified based on which side of the margin they fall. [5].In [9], SVM performs the best with 85.7655% of correctly classified instance and in [10] SVM is used with boosting technique to give an accuracy of 84.81%. HoudaMezrigui et al have used SVM to attain a f-measure value of 93.5617 [11].…”
Section: B Support Vector Machinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two steps are performed recursively with the remaining attributes. In [10]decision tree has the worst performance with an accuracy of 77.55% but when decision tree is used with boosting technique it performs better with an accuracy of 82.17%.In [9] decision tree performs very poorly with a correctly classified instance percentage of 42.8954% whereas in [16] also uses the same dataset but used the J48 algorithm for implementing Decision Trees and the accuracy thus obtained is 67.7% which is less but still an improvement on the former. Renu Chauhan et al have obtained an accuracy of 71.43% [17].…”
Section: Decision Treementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Deng et al [4] have explored a dynamical ECG recognition framework for human identification and cardiovascular diseases classification based on radial basis function (RBF). Besides, Bouali and Akaichi [6] have used many machine learning techniques, such as: Baysian Network, Decision tree, Artificial Neural Network, Fuzzy pattern tree and Support Vector Machine (SVM), to classify the Cleavland heart disease dataset using 10-fold-cross validation. SVM achieved the highest prediction accuracy compared to other classifiers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data often contain hidden patterns and relationships which can lead to improved diagnosis and treatment, and provides a platform to better understand the mechanisms governing almost all aspects of the medical domain [21]. Various data mining techniques, namely, decision tree [22][23][24][25][26][27][28], support vector machine (SVM) [24,25,27], artificial neural networks (ANN) [24,25,27,28], Naïve Bayes [28], Bayesian Networks [25], have been used for CVD diagnosis as black box and models generated were not clinically interpretable. On the other hand, the rules generated by decision trees are clinically interpretable, which is highly desirable in clinical applications [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%