2016
DOI: 10.5301/tj.5000528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of Different Histologic Classifications in the Degree of Differentiation in Endometrial Adenocarcinoma

Abstract: The prognostic value of histologic grading in endometrial carcinoma and its importance for a successful therapeutic plan have been documented repeatedly, but the best grading system, in terms of prognostication, reproducibility, ease of use, and universality (e.g., applicability to all tumor cell types), has not been unequivocally defined.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Histopathological assessment of the EC differentiation degree was conducted referring to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grading system of EC. Briefly, an endometrial glandular component area corresponding to >95%, 50% to 94%, and <50% neoplasm was classified as well-, moderate-, poor-differentiated EC, respectively, with corresponding cellular atypia 14 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Histopathological assessment of the EC differentiation degree was conducted referring to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grading system of EC. Briefly, an endometrial glandular component area corresponding to >95%, 50% to 94%, and <50% neoplasm was classified as well-, moderate-, poor-differentiated EC, respectively, with corresponding cellular atypia 14 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, an endometrial glandular component area corresponding to >95%, 50% to 94%, and <50% neoplasm was classified as well-, moderate-, poor-differentiated EC, respectively, with corresponding cellular atypia. 14 Tissue Sample Processing, DNA Extraction, and Sequencing…”
Section: Participant Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%