1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00698810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of effective rainfall estimation methods for lowland rice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Irrigation water use requirements for the crops and the aggregated demand at the project level are estimated using the field water balance approach (Mohan et al, 1996) for rice and the CROPWAT model (CropWat 4 Windows 4.3, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO, 1998)) for the other upland crops. The assumed overall efficiency at the project level gives the water diversion requirement at the barrage.…”
Section: Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Irrigation water use requirements for the crops and the aggregated demand at the project level are estimated using the field water balance approach (Mohan et al, 1996) for rice and the CROPWAT model (CropWat 4 Windows 4.3, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO, 1998)) for the other upland crops. The assumed overall efficiency at the project level gives the water diversion requirement at the barrage.…”
Section: Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimation of the irrigation water requirements for the rice followed a field water balance approach as presented in Equation (1) (Mohan et al, 1996):…”
Section: Estimation Of Irrigation Water Use Requirementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation of effective rainfall involves measuring rainfall amount, surface run-off, percolation beyond the root zone and the soil moisture uptake by plants. In fact, the effective rainfall estimation has been the subject of research and much debate for more than last 50 years, beginning with Thornthwaite in 1931 (Dastane 1974;Mohan et al 1996;Obreza, Pitts 2002). There are a number of methods available for estimating effective rainfall (Cahoon et al 1992).…”
Section: Effective Rainfallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was calibrated on 50 years of rainfall records at 22 locations throughout the United States [13] and has been shown to perform well in well-drained soils in the USA [14]. However, Mohan et al, [15] found that it under-predicted effective rainfall in India compared to other methods. No evidence could be found of the original USDA SCS method being used in water footprinting studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a more realistic estimate of ET green can be derived from a water balance simulation using local daily rainfall and ETo data over a long time period. This was the approach used to calibrate the USDA SCS method in the 1960s [13] and to test its performance [15]. Although the CROPWAT model has the facility to use daily rainfall and ETo data, it can only run simulations for discrete, individual years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%