2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11075-016-0191-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of eighth-order methods for finding simple roots of nonlinear equations

Abstract: Recently, there were many papers discussing the basins of attraction of various methods and ideas how to choose the parameters appearing in families of methods and weight functions used. Here, we collected many of the eighth-order schemes scattered in the literature and presented a quantitative comparison. We have used the average number of function evaluations per point, the CPU time, and the number of black points to compare the methods. Based on seven examples, we found that the best method based on the thr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we compared the performance of the fourth cases of the new optimal eighth-order methods (2) and (10) with some famous iterative methods. In case NS1 and NS3 we take = 0, 0.5 ,1, −1 but in case NS2 and NS4 we only take = 0 and we take 1 = 1 = 1 = 1 = 0 and for method NS4 we take = 3.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section, we compared the performance of the fourth cases of the new optimal eighth-order methods (2) and (10) with some famous iterative methods. In case NS1 and NS3 we take = 0, 0.5 ,1, −1 but in case NS2 and NS4 we only take = 0 and we take 1 = 1 = 1 = 1 = 0 and for method NS4 we take = 3.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that this variant requires to be of order eight to be an optimal iterative method, so we multiply the last step by two weight functions which they satisfy some conditions and without using more evaluations. These weight functions increased the order of this method from seven to eight in order to be an optimal iterative method, see [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iterative solutions and approximations for the calculation of the flow friction factor are implemented in software packages which are in common use in everyday engineering practice [88]. So in this paper, we analyzed selected iterative procedures in order to solve the Colebrook equation [93,94], and we found that up 2 to 3 iterations of the Halley and the Schröder method are suitable for the accuracy required by engineering practice, when the fixed initial starting point described in Section 2.2.2 is applied. On the other hand, using a threepoint iterative method with the same initial conditions, the required high accuracy can be reached after only 1 iteration (2 in the worst case) but using three internal steps [26][27][28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behavior of iterative methods has been examined from a global point of view by using ideas of dynamical systems, see for example [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Complex dynamics is the most used tool for the study of the global iterative methods, no only because of the good properties of the analytic functions in the complex domain, but also because they provide good pictorial representations in two dimensions.…”
Section: Dynamics Of Osada's Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%