2019 International Conference on Control, Automation and Diagnosis (ICCAD) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/iccad46983.2019.9037883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of face detection methods in spontaneous videos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard Dlib detector uses histograms of oriented gradients (HOG) features with linear SVMs. Some studies have found that HOG + SVM performs better than Haar cascades or Linear Binary Patterns (LBPs) for face detection in video sequences [10,11]. The multi-task cascaded convolutional neural network (MTCNN) model for face detection [12] consists of three convolutional networks (R-Net, P-Net, and O-Net) and is able to outperform other methods on face detection benchmarks while retaining real-time performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard Dlib detector uses histograms of oriented gradients (HOG) features with linear SVMs. Some studies have found that HOG + SVM performs better than Haar cascades or Linear Binary Patterns (LBPs) for face detection in video sequences [10,11]. The multi-task cascaded convolutional neural network (MTCNN) model for face detection [12] consists of three convolutional networks (R-Net, P-Net, and O-Net) and is able to outperform other methods on face detection benchmarks while retaining real-time performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%