2014
DOI: 10.4103/0970-5333.138435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of fascia iliaca compartment block and three in one block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lower limb orthopedic surgeries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 A study done by Anaraki and Mirzaei 15 showed that the use of pre-emptive gabapentin when compared with 0.5% bupivacaine in FICB had lower post-operative satisfaction and duration of analgesia. Furthermore, it is a safe and more efficacious alternative compared to the 3-in-1 block as described by the study done by Pandya and Jhanwar, 16 where they compared the fascia iliaca block with a 3-in-1 nerve block and observed that there was a better sensory blockade of a lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh with FICB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 A study done by Anaraki and Mirzaei 15 showed that the use of pre-emptive gabapentin when compared with 0.5% bupivacaine in FICB had lower post-operative satisfaction and duration of analgesia. Furthermore, it is a safe and more efficacious alternative compared to the 3-in-1 block as described by the study done by Pandya and Jhanwar, 16 where they compared the fascia iliaca block with a 3-in-1 nerve block and observed that there was a better sensory blockade of a lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh with FICB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research discovered a significant difference in VAS ratings between patients receiving 3-in-1 nerve block and control, showing that the 3-in-1 block had higher analgesic effectiveness. Dureja et al 10 before the surgery, the pain was measured using the VAS scale with passive hip flexion in both groups, i.e. (8)(9).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pandya and Jhanwar found that among patients who received FICB, 76.67% of patients rated it as excellent, 16.66% as good, and 6.67% as poor quality of analgesia, whereas among patients who received 3-in-1 block analgesia, it was rated as excellent, good, and poor by 56.77%, 36.66%, and 6.67% of patients, respectively. [ 16 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%