2023
DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2023.02.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of functional optical zone: small incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser assisted excimer laser keratomileusis

Abstract: AIM: To investigate the size of functional optical zone (FOZ) after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus femtosecond laser assisted excimer laser keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for myopia correction and potential associated factors for FOZ. METHODS: A total of 133 patients who received corneal refractive surgery in our hospital between November 2018 and July 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. There were 63 patients (123 eyes) in SMILE group and 70 patients (139 eyes) in FS-LASIK group. The size of FO… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 The small incision through the corneal epithelium used for lenticule removal during LALEX procedures leads to fewer epithelial defects, less postoperative pain and dryness, faster wound healing, and larger postoperative achieved functional optical zones compared to other corneal refractive surgery procedures. 6,[8][9][10] However, visual recovery can be impacted by femtosecond laser energy levels, 9,11 scanning patterns, 12 and surgical technique, 13 and there is a longer learning curve for surgeons compared to conventional LASIK procedures. 2,13 In procedures such as SMILE, tissue bridges are present between the cornea and the lenticule at the two lenticular interfaces after the femtosecond laser cuts are completed, requiring surgeon manipulation to separate the lenticule prior to extraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 The small incision through the corneal epithelium used for lenticule removal during LALEX procedures leads to fewer epithelial defects, less postoperative pain and dryness, faster wound healing, and larger postoperative achieved functional optical zones compared to other corneal refractive surgery procedures. 6,[8][9][10] However, visual recovery can be impacted by femtosecond laser energy levels, 9,11 scanning patterns, 12 and surgical technique, 13 and there is a longer learning curve for surgeons compared to conventional LASIK procedures. 2,13 In procedures such as SMILE, tissue bridges are present between the cornea and the lenticule at the two lenticular interfaces after the femtosecond laser cuts are completed, requiring surgeon manipulation to separate the lenticule prior to extraction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%