2005
DOI: 10.1243/095440505x32643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of genetic algorithm and simulated annealing for optimal tolerance design formulated with discrete and continuous variables

Abstract: Optimal tolerance design has been the focus of extensive research for a few decades. This has resulted in several formulations and solution algorithms for systematic tolerance design considering various aspects. Availability of different alternative manufacturing processes or machines for realization of a dimension is frequently encountered. In such cases optimal tolerance design must also consider optimal selection of a set of manufacturing processes or machines as appropriate. Such a non-linear multivariate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, an extensive analysis is performed here to quantify the applicability and efficiency of this new approach with other representative ones, including genetic optimization, 37,38 simulated annealing–genetic Algorithm (SA–GA), 39 Taguchi estimation, 40,41 ANN–SA prediction, 42 and genetically optimized neural network (GONN), 43 together with their detailed calculations being referenced from the above-mentioned literature; a statistical evaluation concerning with their respective predictive performances could be implemented in identical test conditions. Figure 20 (a)–(e) show that NSAE-ANFIS outperforms other approaches in precision and reliability, since it presents effectiveness indexes in accordance with the actual measured ones with lower estimation errors, demonstrating that this proposed approach ensures an optimal prediction for abrasive jetting stream effectiveness in experiments.…”
Section: Assessments Of Adaptive Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, an extensive analysis is performed here to quantify the applicability and efficiency of this new approach with other representative ones, including genetic optimization, 37,38 simulated annealing–genetic Algorithm (SA–GA), 39 Taguchi estimation, 40,41 ANN–SA prediction, 42 and genetically optimized neural network (GONN), 43 together with their detailed calculations being referenced from the above-mentioned literature; a statistical evaluation concerning with their respective predictive performances could be implemented in identical test conditions. Figure 20 (a)–(e) show that NSAE-ANFIS outperforms other approaches in precision and reliability, since it presents effectiveness indexes in accordance with the actual measured ones with lower estimation errors, demonstrating that this proposed approach ensures an optimal prediction for abrasive jetting stream effectiveness in experiments.…”
Section: Assessments Of Adaptive Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genetic algorithm technique dates back to 1975 and was first introduced by Holland [12]. In the literature, the genetic algorithm has been widely used to solve optimisation problems in many industrial applications such as job shop sequencing and scheduling [13], assembly planning [14], selection of machining parameters in turning operation [15], design of sheet-metal assembly and machining fixtures [16] and tolerance design [17]. The processes of optimisation for the feeder-slot allocation and component sequencing are the two most important factors for improving the efficiency of this assembly operation.…”
Section: Feasibility Of the Genetic Algorithm In Process Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A selection of other solutions involving genetic algorithms for solving the two above-discussed problems includes those of Iannuzzi and Sandgren (1994), Prabhaharan et al (2004) and Singh et al (2005).…”
Section: Tolerance Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%