1994
DOI: 10.1093/tropej/40.3.166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of Growth of Chinese Infants: Hong Kong versus Guangzhou

Abstract: The growth of 174 infants from Hong Kong and 221 infants from Guangzhou from birth to 2 years were compared. Ethnic origins, parental size, and birth weights were similar. Common illnesses in the two groups were upper respiratory tract infection and diarrhoea. The early infant feeding practices were different, with more breastfeeding and earlier introduction of solids in Guangzhou. Compared to those of Hong Kong, Guangzhou babies had lower weight for length in the first year of life. Within the Guangzhou group… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hong Kong infants were both lighter and shorter than Australian infants (Leung and Davies, 1994). A strong correlation was also observed between the height of Hong Kong parents and their offspnng .…”
Section: Growth Of Chinese Infants -Hong Kongmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hong Kong infants were both lighter and shorter than Australian infants (Leung and Davies, 1994). A strong correlation was also observed between the height of Hong Kong parents and their offspnng .…”
Section: Growth Of Chinese Infants -Hong Kongmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Solid foods were introduced betwwn four to six rnonüis of age (Leung and Davies, 1994). By eight mnths, the main oalids were congee or soft rice together with steamed fish, meat and vegetables.…”
Section: Lnfant Feeding Practices In Hong Kongmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is also possible that these observations are due to infections that preclude optimal infant growth (32,33) through growth faltering (34). To clarify this question, we took advantage of data on a large population-representative birth cohort from a developed setting, Hong Kong's Children of 1997, in which infections would be expected to have a limited influence on infant growth (35). Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that infectious morbidity in infancy, but not childhood, would be associated with later puberty without affecting growth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%