2016 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/iceeot.2016.7755527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of harmonics estimation in micro grid using adaptive extended Kalman filter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the weight is given to the measurement and 1-Hk is given to the estimate, as the number of iterations increases the significance of the measurements decreases and the new value comes closer to the previous estimate value [15]. The uncertainty in the estimate needs to be updated with the updating of the state of the dynamic system, for finding the present uncertainty in the estimate using the previous uncertainty, estimate uncertainty update equation or covariance update (7): So, ( 4) and ( 8) is categorized in priori, and represents the prediction of co-variance and state of the system [16], [17]. The equation ( 3) and ( 6) is categorized in posteriori and represents the correction of covariance and state of the system with the block diagram as depicted in Figure 2 which describes the workflow of categorized priori along with prediction of co-variance and state of system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the weight is given to the measurement and 1-Hk is given to the estimate, as the number of iterations increases the significance of the measurements decreases and the new value comes closer to the previous estimate value [15]. The uncertainty in the estimate needs to be updated with the updating of the state of the dynamic system, for finding the present uncertainty in the estimate using the previous uncertainty, estimate uncertainty update equation or covariance update (7): So, ( 4) and ( 8) is categorized in priori, and represents the prediction of co-variance and state of the system [16], [17]. The equation ( 3) and ( 6) is categorized in posteriori and represents the correction of covariance and state of the system with the block diagram as depicted in Figure 2 which describes the workflow of categorized priori along with prediction of co-variance and state of system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the system noise covariance matrix should be increased appropriately. The sensitivity of the Kalman filter depends on the ratio of the system noise covariance matrix Q and the observed noise covariance matrix R [11]. If the description of Q and R in practical applications is inaccurate, the filtering estimation error will be very large or even divergent [11], [12].…”
Section: Measurements Updatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of the Kalman filter depends on the ratio of the system noise covariance matrix Q and the observed noise covariance matrix R [11]. If the description of Q and R in practical applications is inaccurate, the filtering estimation error will be very large or even divergent [11], [12]. Therefore, the adaptive Kalman filter based on the innovation sequence is used to accurately estimate Q and R [13], [14] to enhance the stability of the filter.…”
Section: Measurements Updatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The noise covariance matrices are defined as time-varying matrices, but it is difficult to define how these matrices evolve over time. Some stochastic filters define mathematical expressions for these two noise covariance matrices, obtaining new matrices for each discrete time instant k ∈ N. They are the Adaptive Kalman Filter (AKF) (Brown and Rutan, 1985), the Adaptive Extended Kalman Filter (AEKF) (Nayak et al, 2016) and the Optimal Adaptive Kalman Filter (OAKF) (Yang and Gao, 2006) . Some of these filters are applied to target tracking problems as in Kumar et al (2017); Tripathi et al (2016); Dang (2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%