2014 Science and Information Conference 2014
DOI: 10.1109/sai.2014.6918216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of leaf image recognition with a novel learning-based approach

Abstract: Automatic plant identification via computer vision techniques has been greatly important for a number of professionals, such as environmental protectors, land managers, and foresters. In this paper, we conduct a comparative study on leaf image recognition and propose a novel learning-based leaf image recognition technique via sparse representation (or sparse coding) for automatic plant identification. In our learning-based method, in order to model leaf images, we learn an overcomplete dictionary for sparsely … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Wäldchen and Mäder 2018 ). Many of the earlier studies of automated identification focussed on images of single organs, especially leaves, imaged on plain backgrounds ( Wang et al 2003 ; Agarwal et al 2006 ; Valliammal and Geethalakshmi 2011 ; Hati and Sajeevan 2013 ; Satti et al 2013 ; Shayan and Sajeevan 2013 ; Hsaio et al 2014 ; Zhao et al 2015 ; Lee et al 2017 ; Wäldchen and Mäder 2018 ). Much effort has been centred on the Cross Language Evaluation Forum (CLEF) initiative ( http://www.clef-initiative.eu/association ), which since 2013 included the LifeCLEF challenge to develop automated identification systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Wäldchen and Mäder 2018 ). Many of the earlier studies of automated identification focussed on images of single organs, especially leaves, imaged on plain backgrounds ( Wang et al 2003 ; Agarwal et al 2006 ; Valliammal and Geethalakshmi 2011 ; Hati and Sajeevan 2013 ; Satti et al 2013 ; Shayan and Sajeevan 2013 ; Hsaio et al 2014 ; Zhao et al 2015 ; Lee et al 2017 ; Wäldchen and Mäder 2018 ). Much effort has been centred on the Cross Language Evaluation Forum (CLEF) initiative ( http://www.clef-initiative.eu/association ), which since 2013 included the LifeCLEF challenge to develop automated identification systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification process is based on the classifiers of machine learning such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), Naïve Bayes (NB), Naïve Bayes Tree (NBT). A comparative analysis of the leaf image recognition has been presented in [22] by using SVM classifier with 95.47 % accuracy results. An expert system of plant identification has been proposed in [23] to identify different species of plant based on their images of leaves.…”
Section: Learning Based-approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it is reasonable to use both shape feature and texture feature for leaf recognition. The most commonly used texture features contain entropy sequence (EnS) [10], histogram of gradients (HOG) [11], Zernike moments [12], scale invariant feature transform (SIFT) [13,14], gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) [15], and local binary patterns (LBP) [15]. Fu et al [16] proposed a hybrid framework for plant recognition with complicated background.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%