Comparative Study of Lichtenstein Versus Des Arda Repair for Inguinal Hernia

R, Sowmya G.; Udapudi, Deepak G.

doi:10.14260/jemds/2015/2397

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, Sowmya and Udapudi [23] found that recovery time after Desarda herniorrhaphy was much shorter than that following open hernia repair.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Open inguinal hernia repair Comparative study between external oblique aponeurosis flab herniorrhaphy versus lichtenstein tension free hernioplasty

Abdel‐Wahab

Elgohary²,

Hassan³

et al. 2022

Benha Journal of Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background; The prevalence of inguinal hernias means that they continue to provide a significant medical challenge. Inguinal hernias are 27% more likely to occur in males than in women during the course of their lifetimes. The global range of annual morbidity rates is 100-300 per 100,000 people. The goals of this study are [1] to compare the Desarda technique for inguinal hernia repair with the tension-free mesh (Lichtenstien) approach, and [2] to provide light on the various techniques of tension-free repair of inguinal hernia. Topics and approaches; This randomised controlled experiment was performed at the Benha University Hospital's Department of General Surgery. A total of eighty adult males with primary inguinal hernias participated in the current trial, and they were randomly assigned intraoperatively to receive either the Desarda tissue-based repair (D) or the traditional Lichtenstein mesh repair (L). Even patients who have hernias on both sides are not excluded, albeit they will only have one side repaired at a time. The time it took for people in the DT group to go back to their regular routines was significantly shorter than those in the control group (Independent sample t test, P .005). Independent sample t test: P =.285; no statistically significant difference between groups in terms of time to return to work activities. Desarda repair was shown to be the best option since it required less time in surgery, resulted in lower pain ratings thereafter, and allowed patients to quickly resume their pre-injury level of function. Desarda repair eliminates the need for removal of the mesh, which eliminates the risk of infection, discomfort, and the feeling of having a foreign object in the body. Desarda maintenance is more cost-effective than Lichtenstein maintenance.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, Sowmya and Udapudi [23] found that recovery time after Desarda herniorrhaphy was much shorter than that following open hernia repair.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Open inguinal hernia repair Comparative study between external oblique aponeurosis flab herniorrhaphy versus lichtenstein tension free hernioplasty

Abdel‐Wahab

Elgohary²,

Hassan³

et al. 2022

Benha Journal of Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A Comparative Study of Desarda’s Versus Lichtenstein’s Technique for Uncomplicated Inguinal Hernia Repair

Moghe¹,

Prajapati²,

Banker³

et al. 2022

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Since mesh-related long-term morbidity like chronic groin pain and vas entrapment in patients with an inguinal hernia is a concern, tissue-based repairs should be revaluated. There have been few prospective studies comparing the outcomes of Lichtenstein's technique and Desarda's technique for the repair of uncomplicated inguinal hernias. So, we conducted this prospective study comparing the two techniques. Methods This is a single-center prospective observational study conducted for a period of one year (2019). The patients who underwent surgery for uncomplicated inguinal hernia either by Lichtenstein's technique or Desarda's technique were included in the study. The two techniques were compared with respect to recurrence rates, immediate postoperative pain, chronic groin pain, wound infection, and the time taken to return to activities of daily living (ADL). Results There was no significant difference in the recurrence rates, chronic groin pain, wound infection, or return to ADL between Lichtenstein's technique and Desarda's technique of inguinal hernia repair. The mean duration to return to ADL was lesser when patients underwent Desarda's repair though this difference was not significant. Conclusion Desarda's tissue repair was found comparable to Lichtenstein's mesh repair in terms of recurrence and postoperative morbidity, immediate postoperative pain, chronic groin pain, wound infection, and the time taken to return to ADL. Desarda's technique may be considered as an alternative to mesh-based repairs to avoid long-term mesh-related morbidity for uncomplicated indirect hernias in the younger population.

show abstract

Comparative Study of Lichtenstein Versus Des Arda Repair for Inguinal Hernia

Cited by 2 publications

References 26 publications

Open inguinal hernia repair Comparative study between external oblique aponeurosis flab herniorrhaphy versus lichtenstein tension free hernioplasty

Open inguinal hernia repair Comparative study between external oblique aponeurosis flab herniorrhaphy versus lichtenstein tension free hernioplasty

A Comparative Study of Desarda’s Versus Lichtenstein’s Technique for Uncomplicated Inguinal Hernia Repair

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About