2020
DOI: 10.1080/17445302.2020.1790294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of mathematical models for mooring systems coupled with CFD

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although accurate results were obtained using a morphing grid scheme in our previous works [19,20], for motions in rough sea conditions large mesh deformations were reported in our subsequent study [21], which yielded skewed shapes and unacceptable aspect ratios for grid cells and, consequently, induced numerical instabilities. To dispose of these limitations and still use the same mesh for our subsequent systematic simulations, we adopted the overset mesh scheme.…”
Section: The Viscous Flow Solvermentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although accurate results were obtained using a morphing grid scheme in our previous works [19,20], for motions in rough sea conditions large mesh deformations were reported in our subsequent study [21], which yielded skewed shapes and unacceptable aspect ratios for grid cells and, consequently, induced numerical instabilities. To dispose of these limitations and still use the same mesh for our subsequent systematic simulations, we adopted the overset mesh scheme.…”
Section: The Viscous Flow Solvermentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Mooring line shape and tension were derived from the catenary formulation, based on the assumption that each mooring line is in static equilibrium at each time step and that inertia effects can be neglected. For further details of the adopted quasi-static (QS) model, see [21]. Figure 16 plots tensions in cables 1 and 2 for the QS and the CAT system against the buoy's offset from its equilibrium position, whereas the QS restoring force characteristics were designed according to the CAT.…”
Section: Decay Tests In Surgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is evident that heave motions are hardly affected by the added damper. When a floating structure is moored with a soft mooring system, heave motions are generally dominated by its hydrostatic stiffness and inertia [20]. However, significant discrepancies are evidenced in the pitch motions between the flexible joint without rotational damping and the one with rotational damping, as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MoorDyn is a lumpedmass model that has been successfully validated against wave tank measurements by coupling it to a potential flow solver (Hall and Goupee 2015), to a meshless smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) approach (Domínguez et al 2019), and to a mesh-based viscous flow method (Jiang et al 2020a), respectively. The benefits of the coupled mooringviscous flow solver for solving highly nonlinear rigid-body motions interacting with its mooring dynamics were demonstrated by comparing it to a coupled mooring-potential flow solver (Jiang et al 2020a), and to a coupled quasi-static mooring-viscous flow solver (Jiang et al 2020b). In addition, the implemented mooring model supports various mooring configurations by adding floaters and/or clump-weights on the mooring lines (Vissio et al 2015;Hall 2020;Jiang et al 2020cJiang et al , 2021, as exemplarily shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%