2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-3594-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of microbial community structure in integrated vertical-flow constructed wetlands for treatment of domestic and nitrified wastewaters

Abstract: Microbial processes play a vital important role in the removal of contaminants in constructed wetland (CW). However, the microbial physiology and community structure can be influenced by environmental conditions. In this study, four pilot-scale integrated vertical-flow constructed wetlands (IVCWs) were employed to treat domestic and nitrified wastewaters. The microbial properties, along with their response to wastewater quality characteristics and seasonal variation, were determined. The results showed higher … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[3,5] However, anaerobic decomposition might account for a considerable proportion in the IVCWs, especially at high COD LR due to the low DO levels in the wetland beds. [18,19] COD mass removal rate of the IVCWs increased with the increasing LRs, which was consistent with the results obtained in other CWs, [20][21][22][23][24] and was probably due to the enhanced microbial production and metabolism under higher LR. [20] Nevertheless, a tendency of leveling off for mass removal rate at high LR was observed by Dan et al, [23] suggesting that the organics removal capacity of CW was not infinite.…”
Section: Cod Removal and The Influences Of Crucial Factorssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…[3,5] However, anaerobic decomposition might account for a considerable proportion in the IVCWs, especially at high COD LR due to the low DO levels in the wetland beds. [18,19] COD mass removal rate of the IVCWs increased with the increasing LRs, which was consistent with the results obtained in other CWs, [20][21][22][23][24] and was probably due to the enhanced microbial production and metabolism under higher LR. [20] Nevertheless, a tendency of leveling off for mass removal rate at high LR was observed by Dan et al, [23] suggesting that the organics removal capacity of CW was not infinite.…”
Section: Cod Removal and The Influences Of Crucial Factorssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The optimum temperatures for nitrification and denitrification are ranges within 28-36 °C and 60-70 °C, respectively, whereas temperatures lower than 5 °C can inhibit the activities of both nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria and consequently decrease nitrogen removal rates [31]. However, pH, mass loading, available carbon and nitrogen, redox condition, and microbial diversity in CWs can also influence nitrogen removal rates in addition to the temperature [31,32].…”
Section: Water Temperature Vs Pollutants Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its advantages of low cost, easy maintenance, and environmental friendliness, constructed wetland (CW) has been widely used in treatment of industrial, agricultural, and municipal wastewater (Chang et al 2015;Ji et al 2012;Mulling et al 2014;Xiong et al 2015;Zhi and Ji 2014) and polluted surface water (Dzakpasu et al 2015;Tu et al 2014). Biofilm microbial community, attached to the surfaces of substrate materials (or filter media) in CW, plays crucial roles in the reduction of degradable organic pollutants and transformation of inorganic pollutants including nitrogen, sulfate, and phosphate (Iasur-Kruh et al 2010;Liu et al 2013;Ramond et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biofilm microbial community, attached to the surfaces of substrate materials (or filter media) in CW, plays crucial roles in the reduction of degradable organic pollutants and transformation of inorganic pollutants including nitrogen, sulfate, and phosphate (Iasur-Kruh et al 2010;Liu et al 2013;Ramond et al 2012). In addition, microbial assemblage is sensitive to operational and environmental conditions, and its structure is a good indicator for the status of CW ecosystem (Chang et al 2015). Previous studies using traditional molecular biology approaches [e.g., denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (TRFLP), and clone library analysis] have greatly aided in our understanding of microbial community structure in CW ecosystem (Arroyo et al 2013;Elsayed et al 2014;Iasur-Kruh et al 2010;Morato et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation