2021
DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.isijint-2020-659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of Microstructure-sensitive Fatigue Crack Propagation in Coarse- and Fine-grained Microstructures between Stable and Metastable Austenitic Stainless Steels Using Miniature Specimen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, over the past decades, an alternative technique, named as “miniaturized testing”, had been evolved as a non-invasive approach to obtain material property for structural integrity evaluation. In order to maximize the diversity of measured mechanical properties and minimize the cost, significant efforts have been made to develop a substantial variety of miniature testing, from which a series of various properties can be derived, such as tensile (Zhang et al ., 2021; Zhong et al ., 2019; Janča et al ., 2016), fatigue (Lancaster et al ., 2019; Nogami et al ., 2013, 2017), fracture toughness (Hurst et al ., 2019; Kumar et al ., 2017; Arroyo et al ., 2019), fatigue crack growth (Matsushita et al ., 2021; Wan et al ., 2019b) etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, over the past decades, an alternative technique, named as “miniaturized testing”, had been evolved as a non-invasive approach to obtain material property for structural integrity evaluation. In order to maximize the diversity of measured mechanical properties and minimize the cost, significant efforts have been made to develop a substantial variety of miniature testing, from which a series of various properties can be derived, such as tensile (Zhang et al ., 2021; Zhong et al ., 2019; Janča et al ., 2016), fatigue (Lancaster et al ., 2019; Nogami et al ., 2013, 2017), fracture toughness (Hurst et al ., 2019; Kumar et al ., 2017; Arroyo et al ., 2019), fatigue crack growth (Matsushita et al ., 2021; Wan et al ., 2019b) etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, researchers have strived to understand fatigue mechanisms better and develop fatigue life prediction methods by considering various length scales of crack growth mechanics. [1][2][3][4][5][6] There are different definitions for the length scales of fatigue crack due to its variable growth characteristics among multiple spatial length scales. For instance, Miller 7,8) described the crack length scales as three regimes: (i) the microstructurally short crack (SC), (ii) the physically short crack (PSC), and (iii) the mechanically long crack (LC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%