1993
DOI: 10.1002/oms.1210280408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of Møller–Plesset perturbation theory and configuration interaction theory for the structure of the N4+ cation

Abstract: A theoretical study of the ground electronic state of N4+, the dimer ion of N, , has shown, in agreement with other studies, that the Mrrller-Plesset perturbation expansion for open-shell molecular species is unstable and divergent when used with certain spincontaminated UHF reference wavefunctions. This failure is more serious than in the earlier studies, which noted that the breakdown occurred for the extended bond lengths descriptive of potential energy curves of diatomic systems. In this study the breakdow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both cases, the resulting SOMO (b 2 or b 2u ) simply arises from a destabilizing interaction between both π u orbitals of both monomers. Nevertheless, the calculated energy differences of 3.71 eV (358 kJ/mol) between I1 •+ and I3 •+ and 4.25 eV (410 kJ/mol) between I1 •+ and I4 •+ do not match at all with the PES value of just 1.2 eV 13a (see also ref ). It is tempting to suggest that this second band was simply due to the 2 Π state of N 2 + cation which corresponds to a second ionization energy of 16.66 eV of N 2 and a 2 Π ← 2 Σ excitation energy of 1.14 eV of the N 2 + cation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In both cases, the resulting SOMO (b 2 or b 2u ) simply arises from a destabilizing interaction between both π u orbitals of both monomers. Nevertheless, the calculated energy differences of 3.71 eV (358 kJ/mol) between I1 •+ and I3 •+ and 4.25 eV (410 kJ/mol) between I1 •+ and I4 •+ do not match at all with the PES value of just 1.2 eV 13a (see also ref ). It is tempting to suggest that this second band was simply due to the 2 Π state of N 2 + cation which corresponds to a second ionization energy of 16.66 eV of N 2 and a 2 Π ← 2 Σ excitation energy of 1.14 eV of the N 2 + cation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…22b In this context, much effort has been devoted to search for a way of making a bound tetranitrogen N 4 molecule, the missing but perhaps a key member of the N n family. The abundant literature 23 points out that both the ionized N 4 •+ (refs [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] and neutral N 4 (refs 33-61) forms are the subject of intense theoretical and computational scrutiny. A recent experimental paper 62 reported on the experimental detection of N 4 , but its structural identity is not established yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Can the potential of polynitrogen compounds as high-density−high-energy materials be realized? Since N 2 is likely to be much more stable than any higher nitrogen molecule, it is understandable that the pertinent experimental investigations are far outnumbered by the theoretical literature. However, none of the theoretical studies have been comprehensive and systematic. The present survey compares many N n species and identifies pentazole derivatives as being the thermodynamically most stable polynitrogen compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many polynitrogen and nitrogen-rich systems have been investigated extensively at various levels of theory, e.g., N 4 , N 4 + , N 5 - , N 5 H, , N 6 , ,,18b, N 8 , ,,, N 10 ,21b N 20 , ,, the set of CN 7 - , N(N 3 ) 3 , HN(N 3 ) 2 , N(N 3 ) 2 - molecules and anions, and carbon/nitrogen cubanoids [(CH) 8 - n N n ] 18c…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most striking failure is showed by the Many body perturbation theory to fourth order, which recovers a trans-planar structure. 28,30 In fact, among correlated methods, only quadratic configuration interaction ͑QCI͒ 30,31 and coupled cluster ͑CC͒ 35 can successfully describe the linear centrosymmetric structure of the complex. 12,13 Even CASSCF͑11,12͒ proved to be noncompletely successful, since the ground state was found to be linear, but not centrosymmetric.…”
Section: Doublet Ground Statementioning
confidence: 99%