2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.03.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of new shell-type, sub-2μm fully porous and monolith stationary phases, focusing on mass-transfer resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
73
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
8
73
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the recent development of particle technology for liquid chromatography, the use of core-shell particles has received considerable attention [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The particle size is also a beneficial factor as it improves the rate of mass transfer and reduces the eddy dispersion effect, resulting in smaller plate height and higher optimum linear velocity as the particle size is reduced [17,18].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recent development of particle technology for liquid chromatography, the use of core-shell particles has received considerable attention [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The particle size is also a beneficial factor as it improves the rate of mass transfer and reduces the eddy dispersion effect, resulting in smaller plate height and higher optimum linear velocity as the particle size is reduced [17,18].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Gritti et al [12] have compared Kinetex C18 column and the sub-2 lm particles Acquity BEH C18 column for analysis of large molecule mixtures and have obtained similar peak capacities for both columns. Even though, several publications have investigated Kinetex C18 performance [13][14][15], there is a lack of studies comparing this column with conventional sub-2 lm particles columns for specific applications in gradient mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The three column technologies were already compared [14,15]. Trends are not absolutely toward any of the tree approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%