2019
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-865020190060000003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of peritoneal adhesions after intraperitoneal implantation in rats of meshes of polypropylene versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen

Abstract: Purpose To Compare the extent and intensity of adhesions formed between the intra-abdominal organs and the intraperitoneal implants of polypropylene mesh versus polypropylene/polyglecaprone versus polyester/porcine collagen used for correction of abdominal wall defect in rats. Methods After the defect in the abdominal wall, thirty Wistar rats were placed in three groups (ten animals each) for intraperitoneal mesh imp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its primary purpose is to minimize the appearance of adhesions between intra-abdominal structures and the visceral surface of the mesh. However, this layer must not delay or negatively affect the neoperitonization process of its surface 14 . Secondarily, this interface, mediated by the tissue separating barriers, should compromise neither the inflammation nor the fibroplasia process responsible for the incorporation of the macroporous parietal face of the mesh 15 - 18 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its primary purpose is to minimize the appearance of adhesions between intra-abdominal structures and the visceral surface of the mesh. However, this layer must not delay or negatively affect the neoperitonization process of its surface 14 . Secondarily, this interface, mediated by the tissue separating barriers, should compromise neither the inflammation nor the fibroplasia process responsible for the incorporation of the macroporous parietal face of the mesh 15 - 18 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%