Molybdenum trioxide (MoO 3), the most stable oxide of molybdenum, comprises layers of edge-shared MoO 6 octahedra in an orthorhombic crystal 1). This material is commonly applied to catalysts 2-5) , photochromic or electrochromic materials 6,7) , and anti-bacterial agents 8,9). This oxide forms a solid solution ((Mo, W)O 3) with WO 3. Its crystal structure is the same as that of WO 3 1) , a well-known photocatalyst material 10). An earlier study revealed that the particles of (Mo, W)O 3 powder prepared using hydrothermal processing are smaller than particles of pure MoO 3 11). Its bandgap is smaller than pure WO 3. These characteristics indicate that (Mo, W)O 3 is a candidate photocatalyst material for use in visible light. However, the reduction power of (Mo, W)O 3 is insufficient for its use as photocatalyst by itself because the conduction band (CB) of WO 3 decreases (becomes positive) with dissolution of Mo 11,12). Based on the reported value of the CB level of (Mo, W)O 3 , multi-electron reduction of oxygen is infeasible by the modification of Cu-clusters onto the powder surface, which is effective for provision of visible light photocatalytic activity to WO 3 by the interface charge transfer 13). By contrast, Cu reacts with WO 3 and MoO 3 and forms CuWO 4 and CuMoO 4 at 500-800°C in ambient air atmosphere 14,15). Recent reports have revealed that Cu(W 1-x , Mo x)O 4 is an n-type semiconductor with a bandgap of 2.1-2.3 eV. Its valence band (VB) level is located in the bandgap of (Mo, W)O 3 16,17). Very recently, we provided visible light photocatalytic activity to (Mo, W)O 3 powder by modification of Cu(W 1-x , Mo x)O 4 on the surface 18). Detailed analysis revealed that the Hedvall effect 19) at the phase transition of (Mo, W)O 3 from orthorhombic to monoclinic at 400-450°C during heating hastens Cu(W 1-x , Mo x)O 4 formation, and revealed that the resultant construction of Z-scheme between (Mo, W)O 3 and Cu(W 1-x , Mo x)O 4 provides visible light photocatalytic activity. Although this material might exhibit antibacterial effects not only under visible light but also in the dark because of MoO 3 in the surface, this activity has not been examined to date. Moreover, the controllable surface concentration ratio between (Mo, W)O 3 and Cu(W 1-x , Mo x)O 4 is limited in the previous process because of impregnation of a CuCl 2 solution and subsequent one-time heat treatment for the Hedvall effect. It is important to develop a different processing route to evaluate the potential of this material in a wide chemical composition range. Based on this background, we first examined antibacterial activity both in the dark and under visible light using the (Mo 0.5 , W 0.5)O 3 powder with Cu(W 0.5 , Mo 0.5)O 4 prepared in our previous study. Secondly, mechanochemical processing 20,21) was investigated to hybridize Cu(Mo 0.5 , W 0.5)O 4 with (Mo 0.5 , W 0.5)O 3. The photocatalytic activity of the powders prepared through this process was evaluated using decomposition of gaseous 2-propanol (IPA) under visible light 22) .