2015
DOI: 10.1155/2015/895267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of Retinal Vessel Segmentation Based on Global Thresholding Techniques

Abstract: Due to noise from uneven contrast and illumination during acquisition process of retinal fundus images, the use of efficient preprocessing techniques is highly desirable to produce good retinal vessel segmentation results. This paper develops and compares the performance of different vessel segmentation techniques based on global thresholding using phase congruency and contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE) for the preprocessing of the retinal images. The results obtained show that the combin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The significant difference in average sensitivity rate indicates the significant difference in the detection rate of the vessels and the significant difference in accuracy rate indicates the significant difference in the accuracy rate of the retinal vessel segmentation. Both measures are very important as good vessel segmentation method for efficient vessel analysis in ophthalmology requires that sensitivity and accuracy rates of the segmentation be good 2015). The statistical significance of a difference between two proportions is evaluated as…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The significant difference in average sensitivity rate indicates the significant difference in the detection rate of the vessels and the significant difference in accuracy rate indicates the significant difference in the accuracy rate of the retinal vessel segmentation. Both measures are very important as good vessel segmentation method for efficient vessel analysis in ophthalmology requires that sensitivity and accuracy rates of the segmentation be good 2015). The statistical significance of a difference between two proportions is evaluated as…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section presents an unsupervised vessel segmentation approach to address the problems of inability to detect the thinner vessels (Martínez-Pérez et al;Vlachos and Dermatas;Saffarzadeh et al;2015) connectivity loss in vessel network (Jiang and Mojon;. Since unsupervised vessel segmentation methods are not dependent on labelled training set, the method investigated in this paper also overcomes the major drawback of supervised segmentation methods which is their high dependence on the labelled training with the retraining of the classifiers Marín et al;.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 shows the comparison proposed method with method proposed by [1, 7,15] taking the first image from the DRIVE database. In this paper five different mathematical measures such as sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy (Acc) are used for experimentation [34]. Sensitivity can be defined as the ability of the segmentation method to identify the number of pixels as vessel pixels.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluation and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compute infinite perimeter regularization, L2 Lebesgue integral technique is employed by [11]. For retinal image preprocessing, the method of global thresholding is used [12]. For DRIVE and STARE datasets, the vessel detection by morphological component analysis (MCA) had achieved 0.9523 and 0.959 as accuracy correspondingly [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%