2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.05.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of SMBR and extended aeration activated sludge processes in the treatment of high-strength wastewaters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar observation was made by Hamoda et al (1996) in their study of biological nitrification kinetics in a fixed film bioreactor. Muhammadi et al (2012) compared the performance of an Extended Aeration Activated Sludge (EAAS) with Submerged Membrane Bioreactor (SMBR) treating high strength wastewater. The authors observed a 88 -99% ammonia removal for SMBR and 71-98% for EAAS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar observation was made by Hamoda et al (1996) in their study of biological nitrification kinetics in a fixed film bioreactor. Muhammadi et al (2012) compared the performance of an Extended Aeration Activated Sludge (EAAS) with Submerged Membrane Bioreactor (SMBR) treating high strength wastewater. The authors observed a 88 -99% ammonia removal for SMBR and 71-98% for EAAS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%