2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/9454982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of Strength and Corrosion Resistant Properties of Plain and Blended Cement Concrete Types

Abstract: The relative performances of mechanical, permeability, and corrosion resistance properties of different concrete types were compared. Concrete types were made from ordinary Portland cement (OPC), Portland pozzolana cement (PPC), and Portland slag cement (PSC). Compressive strength test, effective porosity test, coefficient of water absorption, short-term accelerated impressed voltage test, and rapid chloride permeability test (RCPT) were conducted on M30 and M40 grades of concrete designed with OPC, PPC, and P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The percentage increase in compressive strength from 28 days to 90 days was found to be similar in M30 grade and M40 grade concrete types. Comparable compressive strength values were obtained for Portland Pozzolana Cement and Portland Slag cement types when compared with Ordinary Portland cement concrete strength values [13]. The properties of cement are seen in Table 1.…”
Section: Cementmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The percentage increase in compressive strength from 28 days to 90 days was found to be similar in M30 grade and M40 grade concrete types. Comparable compressive strength values were obtained for Portland Pozzolana Cement and Portland Slag cement types when compared with Ordinary Portland cement concrete strength values [13]. The properties of cement are seen in Table 1.…”
Section: Cementmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Concrete that uses PPC has advantages over OPC. The corrosion resistance properties of concrete using PPC are higher than concrete using OPC [4]. Concrete using PPC has better performance than concrete using OPC in sea water [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It is worth noting that all steel-reinforced concrete samples in this first set were cured in curing room for 28 days [67,68], as per ASTM C192/192 M-16a [65]. The second set of steelreinforced concrete samples includes three samples that were cast in similar manner to the samples for electrochemical experiment (the first set) but with 0.00% admixture and which were cured in water for 28 days [11,41,69]. These samples of the second set are not subjected to electrochemical corrosion monitoring but are employed in the study as control samples for the compressive-strength testing according to the specification from ASTM C267-01(2012) [70].…”
Section: 13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) Corrosion-rate (CR) using the 3-electrode LPR Data Logger from Metal Samples5, whereby saturated calomel electrode (SCE) from EDT direct-ION5 is the reference, brass plate is auxiliary, and the reinforcingsteel embedded in concrete is the working electrode [11,45]: For giving readout of the corrosion-rate directly, this LPR instrument nulls the potential difference between the reference and working electrodes before increasing current flow between the auxiliary and working electrodes. The ratio Δ /Δ , from the shifted working electrode potential (Δ ) relative to the reference electrode by the polarizing current (Δ ), is then used by the LPR instrument to compute the directly readout corrosion-rate on the instrument [15].…”
Section: Electrochemical Corrosion Test-proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation