2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:cele.0000023391.85690.31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of the 2:3 and 3:4 Resonant Motion with Neptune: An Application of Symplectic Mappings and Low Frequency Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that our guiding lines are actually guiding lines for the problem with the Hamiltonian given by Equations (9-12) which can differ from the full Hamiltonian. This approximation is used in many studies of external resonances recently by Kotoulas and Voyatzis (2004) or Hadjifontinou and Hadjidemetriou (2002).…”
Section: Limitations Of the Method Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that our guiding lines are actually guiding lines for the problem with the Hamiltonian given by Equations (9-12) which can differ from the full Hamiltonian. This approximation is used in many studies of external resonances recently by Kotoulas and Voyatzis (2004) or Hadjifontinou and Hadjidemetriou (2002).…”
Section: Limitations Of the Method Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the localization of a stable periodic orbit in this case is associated with the existence of regular orbits in the neighborhood of such a periodic orbit. Additionally, the numerical simulations show that the eccentricity of Neptune introduce small perturbations to the circular problem that do not affect significantly the long term stability of the resonant librating motion near the stable periodic orbits of the circular problem (Malhotra, 1996;Kotoulas and Voyatzis, 2004a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Since that time, it has been used to probe the dynamics of many different astrophysical systems [Goździewski et al, 2001, Goździewski, 2002, Laughlin et al, 2002, Pilat-Lohinger et al, 2003. For examples using the MEGNO method and other chaos indicator methods, we recommend Pavlov and Maciejewski [2003], Kotoulas and Voyatzis [2004], Barnes and Greenberg [2006], Funk et al [2009], , Hinse et al [2010], Mestre et al [2011], and Satyal et al [2013].…”
Section: Mean Exponential Growth Factor Of Nearby Orbitsmentioning
confidence: 99%