2017
DOI: 10.1002/pat.4200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of the effects of nano‐sized and micro‐sized CF and PTFE on the thermal and tribological properties of PEEK composites

Abstract: The tribological characteristics of PEEK composites fretting against GCr 15 steel were investigated by a SRV-IV oscillating reciprocating ball-on-disk tribometer. In order to clarify the effect of type and size of fillers on the properties of PEEK composites, nano-sized and micro-sized CF and PTFE fillers were added to the PEEK matrix. The thermal conductivity, hardness, and fretting wear properties of PEEK composites reinforced by CF or PTFE were comparatively studied. The results showed that the type and siz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a lower friction coefficient was obtained with the increase of load for PEEK/SCF and PEEK/SCF/CS composites, which may be due to the good thermal conductivity of carbon fiber and cenosphere. Carbon fiber or cenosphere can help conduct heat of the frictional contact surface in time, the surface temperature is relative lower compared with PEEK, then there is no serious adhesive wear (see Figure ) of PEEK composites under high load . Here, in this case, the former of the two competitive actions takes over the dominant position.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, a lower friction coefficient was obtained with the increase of load for PEEK/SCF and PEEK/SCF/CS composites, which may be due to the good thermal conductivity of carbon fiber and cenosphere. Carbon fiber or cenosphere can help conduct heat of the frictional contact surface in time, the surface temperature is relative lower compared with PEEK, then there is no serious adhesive wear (see Figure ) of PEEK composites under high load . Here, in this case, the former of the two competitive actions takes over the dominant position.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The reason is that the shear strength of pure PEEK resin decreases under high load, and serious adhesion wear occurs on the surface during friction, which increases the friction coefficient. For CS/SCF/PEEK and CS/SCF‐SiO 2 /PEEK composites, a positive rolling effect of micrometer‐sized CS and nano‐SiO 2 particles between the material pairs reduced the stress concentration on the fibers, while SCF could reduce the friction heat on the wear surface to avoid the phenomenon of severe adhesion . Eventually, the friction coefficient was reduced.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the poor mechanical properties and high wear rate of PTFE have limited its application in the abovementioned fields [4][5][6]. To reduce the wear rate and exploit the advantages of PTFE, researchers have found that load-carrying capability and wear resistance can be improved by filling the PTFE matrix with various fillers such as organic and inorganic fibers [7,8], and nano-and microscaled particles [9,10]. For example, Burris and Sawyer reported improvement in anti-wear properties by up to four-orders of magnitude by incorporating nano-Al 2 O 3 into PTFE [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%