2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-63065-6_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study of the Psychosocial Risks Prevention Enforcement by the European Labour Inspectorates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…‘Regulatory policies’ comprise regulations to promote occupational health and safety, tackle discrimination and promote equality (such as regional or national legislation, ILO conventions), while ‘non-binding/voluntary’ policies developed by recognised regional, national and international organisations include standards and specifications, guidance, recommendations and social partner agreements [ 31 ]. Some countries have enacted national laws, codes of practice and collective agreements to regulate psychosocial risks, setting employers’ responsibilities to deal with these issues [ 30 , 32 ], while certain labour inspectorates have designed procedures to enforce relevant regulations [ 33 ]. There is also some evidence which indicates that efforts have been made to share knowledge and develop competencies of key stakeholders in this area, such as inspectors [ 34 ] and occupational health services [ 18 ].…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…‘Regulatory policies’ comprise regulations to promote occupational health and safety, tackle discrimination and promote equality (such as regional or national legislation, ILO conventions), while ‘non-binding/voluntary’ policies developed by recognised regional, national and international organisations include standards and specifications, guidance, recommendations and social partner agreements [ 31 ]. Some countries have enacted national laws, codes of practice and collective agreements to regulate psychosocial risks, setting employers’ responsibilities to deal with these issues [ 30 , 32 ], while certain labour inspectorates have designed procedures to enforce relevant regulations [ 33 ]. There is also some evidence which indicates that efforts have been made to share knowledge and develop competencies of key stakeholders in this area, such as inspectors [ 34 ] and occupational health services [ 18 ].…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For those responsible for managing workplace health and safety obligations, the implications of this study should be concerning. Consistent failure to address issues that contribute significantly to fatigue such as understaffing, failure to provide legally mandated breaks and overscheduling work‐loads indicate a potentially dysfunctional (patient) safety culture within the organisation and expose hospitals and administrators to significant legal liability in the event of a fatigue‐related error/adverse event .…”
Section: Workplace Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this association is less direct than the link with error, work‐related fatigue has also been linked with increased risk of mental illness and has frequently been identified as a potential cause of suicide in junior doctors . If this is the case, fatigue may also carry additional liability for employers where it can be demonstrated that the working time arrangement contributed to the health problems experienced by an employee .…”
Section: Workplace Arrangementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regulation of psychosocial risks is a new and under-researched area. A small number of research studies have investigated inspection methods and approaches (see Bruhn & Frick, 2011;Johnstone et al, 2011;Quinlan, 2007;Quinlan, McNamara, & Johnstone, 2009;Rasmussen, Hansen, Nielsen, 2011;Starheim & Rasmussen, 2011;Toukas et al, 2015;Velázquez, 2017). Other studies have examined the role of management standards and systems in auditing psychosocial risks within organisations (see Hohnen et al, 2014;Leka et al, 2011 for examples).…”
Section: Whs State Regulators and Psychosocial Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%