2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.odw.2015.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of the treatment effects of bionator and bite jumping appliances on Class II malocclusions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reference [11] gave different results where the treatment of class II malocclusion at the prepubertal stage had more effect on the dentoalveolar than skeletal aspects, where there was a significant increase in the sagittal intermaxillary relationship between SNA and A-Nprep which was in line with [16]. This is in line with the growth process of the jaw and changes in the soft tissue profile with age, where mandibular growth was found to be 2 times greater at the age of 14-16 years, namely puberty or growth spurt [11], [16], [25], [38], [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Reference [11] gave different results where the treatment of class II malocclusion at the prepubertal stage had more effect on the dentoalveolar than skeletal aspects, where there was a significant increase in the sagittal intermaxillary relationship between SNA and A-Nprep which was in line with [16]. This is in line with the growth process of the jaw and changes in the soft tissue profile with age, where mandibular growth was found to be 2 times greater at the age of 14-16 years, namely puberty or growth spurt [11], [16], [25], [38], [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Reference [35] in a systematic review found that the mandibles significant response to treatment with functional appliances was at the peak of puberty, and the response was skeletal changes. In contrast to [31] compared the mandibular response to functional treatment to be higher at the end of puberty compared to treatment starting in early puberty [25], [28], [35]. The increase in length of the mandible also affects the convexity of the facial profile which is characteristic of Class II malocclusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations