2010
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/12/4/043042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of theoretical methods for non-equilibrium quantum transport

Abstract: We present a detailed comparison of three different methods designed to tackle nonequilibrium quantum transport, namely the functional renormalization group (fRG), the time-dependent density matrix renormalization group (tDMRG), and the iterative summation of real-time path integrals (ISPI). For the nonequilibrium single-impurity Anderson model (including a Zeeman term at the impurity site), we demonstrate that the three methods are in quantitative agreement over a wide range of parameters at the particle-hole… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
158
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
9
158
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[46][47][48][49] The Gutzwiller approximation has been generalized to the time-dependent case 50 and so has numerical renormalization group (NRG) [51][52][53][54] where however some issues with the use of Wilson chains in nonequilibrium systems have been pointed out by Rosch. 55 Dual-fermion approaches 56 have been proposed as well as superoperator techniques. 57,58 Some recent work attempts to compare several of these theories [59][60][61] and shed light on the critical issue of time scales involved. 62 Finally, some results for the SIAM are available 63 from numerically exact time evolution by a combination of density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) 64 and successive time evolution via time-dependent DMRG (tDMRG).…”
Section: Published By the American Physical Society Under The Terms Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[46][47][48][49] The Gutzwiller approximation has been generalized to the time-dependent case 50 and so has numerical renormalization group (NRG) [51][52][53][54] where however some issues with the use of Wilson chains in nonequilibrium systems have been pointed out by Rosch. 55 Dual-fermion approaches 56 have been proposed as well as superoperator techniques. 57,58 Some recent work attempts to compare several of these theories [59][60][61] and shed light on the critical issue of time scales involved. 62 Finally, some results for the SIAM are available 63 from numerically exact time evolution by a combination of density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) 64 and successive time evolution via time-dependent DMRG (tDMRG).…”
Section: Published By the American Physical Society Under The Terms Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former are based on either a mean-field approximation or perturbative schemes, where the inclusion of higher order corrections is not always clear or systematic, and thus may lead to questionable results. Numerical brute-force approaches, such as time-dependent numerical renormalization-group techniques [12][13][14][15] , iterative [16][17][18] or stochastic [19][20][21][22] diagrammatic methods, and wave function based approaches 23 , have been very fruitful, but are limited in the range of parameters and timescales that can be studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…86 For a comparison and an overview of various different methods in the related problem of nonequilibrium transport with electron-electron interaction, see Ref. 87.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%