2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2013.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of turbulence models in application to gas ejectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relation of this result to the ejector performance is that the positioning of the shocks should be better captured with the SKE model. This result is in agreement with the PIV study developed by Gagan et al [10] where the shock train structure is better predicted by the SKE model.…”
Section: Shock Wave E Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The relation of this result to the ejector performance is that the positioning of the shocks should be better captured with the SKE model. This result is in agreement with the PIV study developed by Gagan et al [10] where the shock train structure is better predicted by the SKE model.…”
Section: Shock Wave E Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…A considerable share of the CFD studies found in the literature, Sriveerakul et al [21], Zhu and Jiang [31], Pianthong et al [36], Zhu et al [37] and Gagan et al [10]; consider the working fluid as an ideal gas. Sometimes, the ideal gas assumption was selected in order to avoid the difficulty in the mathematical model, without verification of it [24].…”
Section: Real Gas Thermophysical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of particular importance is the dissipative effect of the shock trains as it produces a compression and a shift from supersonic to subsonic conditions. There is considerable research concerning experimental [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65] and numerical [66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81] studies of the flow phenomena inside an ejector. Even further detailed knowledge and modeling of these phenomena should allow for better component design.…”
Section: Supersonic Ejectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In references [69,229], Standard k-ε, Realizable k-ε, RNG k-ε, k-ω SST models were tested with N 2 and air as working fluids, retaining RNG k-ε as the most appropriate for tested conditions. Gagan et al [245] presented flow visualisation investigations by applying the particle image velocimetry (PIV) technique along with CFD modeling and recommended standard k-ε model as best representing their results.…”
Section: Turbulence Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%