2007
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0490-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study of various algorithms for the merging of parton showers and matrix elements in hadronic collisions

Abstract: Abstract. We compare different procedures for combining fixed-order tree-level matrix-element generators with parton showers. We use the case of W -production at the Tevatron and the LHC to compare different implementations of the so-called CKKW and MLM schemes using different matrix-element generators and different parton cascades. We find that although similar results are obtained in all cases, there are important differences.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
506
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 797 publications
(520 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
506
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with Ref. [28], both alpgen + pythia and sherpa are found to show a sensitivity to the choice of scales which is similar to that of a LO pQCD prediction, reflecting a limited predictive power. For the leading jet at p T = 100 GeV, the prediction of sherpa with both scales shifted down by a factor of two is about three times higher than the alpgen + pythia prediction with both scales shifted up.…”
Section: Pacssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In agreement with Ref. [28], both alpgen + pythia and sherpa are found to show a sensitivity to the choice of scales which is similar to that of a LO pQCD prediction, reflecting a limited predictive power. For the leading jet at p T = 100 GeV, the prediction of sherpa with both scales shifted down by a factor of two is about three times higher than the alpgen + pythia prediction with both scales shifted up.…”
Section: Pacssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Both generators combine tree-level matrix elements with parton showers [27][28][29], thereby utilizing matrix elements also for sub-leading jets. For the central alpgen + pythia prediction, the factorization scale is…”
Section: Pacsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid double counting, we have matched the matrix element to the parton shower through the MLM scheme [22] implemented in MadGraph5. This generation procedure allows to include nontrivial p T distributions.…”
Section: Angular Distribution In Tt Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have showered the parton level outcome with Pythia [15] to include the initial state radiation. To avoid double counting, we have matched the matrix element with up to one extra jet to the parton shower through the MLM scheme [17] implemented in MadGraph5. We have used a K-factor of 1.55 which comes out from comparing the same simulation at 7 TeV to tt production at NNLL order [18] at this energy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%