Ahstract-This paper presents two solutions for dramatically reduce the sampling frequency and therefore the CPU demand while keeping the same performance in terms of torque ripple and efficiency on a SRM. The problem of a low sampling frequency with a regular control is first highlighted. Then, two different solutions are proposed for the self switching's function. Such solutions tries to magnetize the stator phase at an accurate instant in order to reduce the inherent torque ripple. Simulations results on a 8/6 SRM corroborate the validity of the proposed solutions and show the improvements of its performance.Index Terms-Switched reluctance machine, sampling period enlargement, self switching, torque ripple, efficiency.
IN TRODUCTIONT HE switched reluctance machines (SRM) had attracted many researchers over the last decade. This is certainly due to its numerous advantages such as simple and robust construction, high-speed and high-temperature performance, low costs, and fault tolerant control capabilities [1], [2]. The performance of SRM has been enhanced greatly due to ad vances in power electronics and computer science. Nowadays, SRM are under consideration in various applications requiring high performances such as in electric vehicle propulsion However, several disadvantages like acoustic noise genera tion, torque ripple, nonlinear electromagnetic characteristics, the strong dependence on the rotor position, requirement of a high powerful processor are limiting its utilization compared to other type of machines.For cost reasons, manufacturers usually try to use economic processors, i.e. with a low sampling frequency. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to show that it is possible to control an SRM with no degradation of its performances, using low powerful processors. This paper is organized in three sections as follows: in the first section, the paper recalls the SRM's control. In the second section, the influence of a low sampling frequency II. SRM's CONTROL Fig.1 illustrates a SRM's control strategy based on an average torque control [7], [8]. The SRM's control consists of 4 functions: speed control, torque control strategy, a switch control signal generator and current control. The last 3 blocks compose an open-loop average torque control. As with any type of electrical machine, the speed controller's output pro vides the electromagnetic required torque T:rn.In this strategy, the reference torque is considered as an average torque over one conducting period. It is controlled indirectly by adjusting the three fundamental variables, i.e., reference-phase current J*, tum-on angle eon, and tum-off angle eo ff. One important feature of this regular controller is that the reference-phase current is constant over one excitation period. Thereby, this control is also called "square wave control". Many combinations of these control variables are possible to control the SRM at one specific torque-speed operating point. However, one suitable combination for one speed-torque operating point should be chosen, based o...