2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12934-022-01950-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study on antimicrobial activity of mono-rhamnolipid and di-rhamnolipid and exploration of cost-effective antimicrobial agents for agricultural applications

Abstract: Background Chemical pesticides have defects in crop diseases control, such as narrow antimicrobial spectrum, chemicals residue risk and harm to farmland ecosystem. Antimicrobial agents from microbial sources are highly interested in agriculture. Studies showed that rhamnolipid biosurfactants possessed certain antimicrobial activity. The structural differences in rhamnolipid inevitably affect their activities. But the antimicrobial effect of mono-rhamnolipid and di-rhamnolipid is unknown. Rhamno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reports on the antimicrobial activity of BS by P. aeruginosa against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and yeast investigated in this research, as well as other microorganisms of industrial and medical importance, have already been described in the literature 57 , 58 . Gram-positive bacteria usually are more susceptible to BS 59 , whose inhibition mechanism occurs through the insertion of fatty acid components (short acyl tails) into the bacterial cell membrane, causing a break between the cytoskeletal elements and the plasma membrane 57 , 58 . However, Gram-negative bacteria are normally more resistant to BS, possibly due to the presence of lipopolysaccharide and extracellular polymers in the outer membrane, which is little permeable to hydrophobic and amphipathic molecules 59 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reports on the antimicrobial activity of BS by P. aeruginosa against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and yeast investigated in this research, as well as other microorganisms of industrial and medical importance, have already been described in the literature 57 , 58 . Gram-positive bacteria usually are more susceptible to BS 59 , whose inhibition mechanism occurs through the insertion of fatty acid components (short acyl tails) into the bacterial cell membrane, causing a break between the cytoskeletal elements and the plasma membrane 57 , 58 . However, Gram-negative bacteria are normally more resistant to BS, possibly due to the presence of lipopolysaccharide and extracellular polymers in the outer membrane, which is little permeable to hydrophobic and amphipathic molecules 59 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gram-positive bacteria usually are more susceptible to BS 59 , whose inhibition mechanism occurs through the insertion of fatty acid components (short acyl tails) into the bacterial cell membrane, causing a break between the cytoskeletal elements and the plasma membrane 57 , 58 . However, Gram-negative bacteria are normally more resistant to BS, possibly due to the presence of lipopolysaccharide and extracellular polymers in the outer membrane, which is little permeable to hydrophobic and amphipathic molecules 59 . The weak antifungal activity can be attributed to the BS composition, as suggested by Rodrigues et al 60 ; compared to di-RL, mono-RL congeners interact weakly with the fungal phospholipid bilayer, and in our heterogeneous mixture of rhamnolipids, the ratio of mono-RL is higher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B, Actinomucor sp. Y and Penicillium oxalicum S11, and even against certain bacteria such as Escherichia coli DH5α, Bacillus wiedmannii H238, B. Safensis B36# and Pantoea agglomerans B10 [40,41]. A comparison of mRLs and dRLs from different producers showed that defense gene expression induction in grapevine cells is highly individual in response to the same concentration of mRLs or dRLs from P. aeruginosa (predominant C10-C10 acyl chain) or dRLs from B. plantarii (predominant C14-C14 acyl chain) [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In agriculture, RLs effectively take part in disease management by diminishing the growth of phytopathogens. These biosurfactants also have antiviral, antifungal, and antibacterial potential . The benefits and market potential of RLs have been extensively studied, , e.g., the virucidal effects of RLs were recalled when COVID-19 emerged as global issue .…”
Section: Pseudomonas Species Producing Rhamnolipids (Biosurfactants)mentioning
confidence: 99%