Comparative Study on Indium Precursors for Plasma-Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition of In₂O₃ and Application to High-Performance Field-Effect Transistors

Abstract

Indium oxide (In2O3) is a transparent wide-bandgap semiconductor suitable for use in the back-end-of-line-compatible channel layers of heterogeneous monolithic three-dimensional (M3D) devices. The structural, chemical, and electrical properties of In2O3 films deposited by plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition (PEALD) were examined using two different liquid-based precursors: (3-(dimethylamino)­propyl)-dimethyl indium (DADI) and (N,N-dimethylbutylamine)­trimethylindium (DATI). DATI-derived In2O3 films had higher growth per cycle (GPC), superior crystallinity, and low defect density compared with DADI-derived In2O3 films. Density functional theory calculations revealed that the structure of DATI can exhibit less steric hindrance compared with that of DADI, explaining the superior physical and electrical properties of the DATI-derived In2O3 film. DATI-derived In2O3 field-effect transistors (FETs) exhibited unprecedented performance, showcasing a high field-effect mobility of 115.8 cm2/(V s), a threshold voltage of −0.12 V, and a low subthreshold gate swing value of <70 mV/decade. These results were achieved by employing a 10-nm-thick HfO2 gate dielectric layer with an effective oxide thickness of 3.9 nm. Both DADI and DATI-derived In2O3 FET devices exhibited remarkable stability under bias stress conditions due to a high-quality In2O3 channel layer, good gate dielectric/channel interface matching, and a suitable passivation layer. These findings underscore the potential of ALD In2O3 films as promising materials for upper-layer channels in the next generation of M3D devices.

Strong Immunity to Drain-Induced Barrier Lowering in ALD-Grown Preferentially Oriented Indium Gallium Oxide Transistors

“…This enhancement could be due to the decreased grain-boundaries through the crystal enlargement by the preferential growth. The po-IGO TFTs also exhibit outstanding reliabilities on positive/negative bias light stresses 45 (Figure S9 in the Supporting Information).…”