2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2021.107903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study on joining quality of electromagnetic driven self-piecing riveting, adhesive and hybrid joints for Al/steel structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Once the first phase of control is satisfied, and it is confirmed that a certain percentage of penetration has been achieved, controlled weld joint proceeds to further control procedures to check appearance of weld, strength and at last corrosion resistance as final advantage of joined materials. Over the last decades, there have been improvement in joining materials technology and anticorrosion behaviour [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the first phase of control is satisfied, and it is confirmed that a certain percentage of penetration has been achieved, controlled weld joint proceeds to further control procedures to check appearance of weld, strength and at last corrosion resistance as final advantage of joined materials. Over the last decades, there have been improvement in joining materials technology and anticorrosion behaviour [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, adhesive joints present a more uniform stress distribution, help to avoid possible corrosion issues, and promote weight saving in comparison to mechanical joints [ 2 , 3 ]. In fact, recent studies have dealt with the development of novel joining techniques, such as electromagnetic-driven, self-piecing riveting for joints with dissimilar materials and with Al/steel substrates, examining their mechanical performance and corrosion properties [ 4 ], as well the joining quality [ 5 ] in comparison to adhesive and hybrid joints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since fatigue cracks generally originate inside the brittle IMC layer, researchers have recommended limiting the thickness of the IMC layer to less than 10 µm to achieve mechanically sound joints [10][11][12]. In contrast, solid-state joining methods, such as explosion welding, friction welding, riveted-adhesive hybrid joining technique, and electrically assisted pressure joining, avoid melting of the alloys and thereby avert most solidification defects [13][14][15][16][17][18]. Nevertheless, due to the need for high pressure to induce large deformation of materials and also to comply with safety restrictions, explosion welding [17] and friction welding [15] are generally limited to welding components made of highly ductile materials with simple shapes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrically assisted pressure joining produces joints by establishing diffusion bonding under the joining conditions of plastic deformation and elevated temperature, which is generally necessary to extend the longer diffusion time to enhance the bonding strength [16]. Riveted-adhesive hybrid joining technique includes two joining methods of adhesive and riveting to enhance the reliability of joint, but it undoubtedly increases the process and causes the rise of cost [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%