2020
DOI: 10.1177/0958305x20923119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study on the economic feasibility of nanogrid and microgrid electrification: The case of Jeju Island, South Korea

Abstract: Due to heavy fuel dependence, the “renewable energy system” idea is an important issue in South Korea. The government of South Korea is endeavoring to convert its energy infrastructure into renewable energy generation. As such, numerous studies have evaluated the economic feasibility of various renewable energy sources in South Korea. This study differs from those studies as it is focused on a smaller scale in terms of self-supporting nanogrid and microgrid energy. The purpose of this study is to determine whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The significance of these results lies in providing support for policy-maker decisions that can promote the decentralized and renewable generation model. The same indication regarding how the costs of BESS push nanogrid payback indicators further is found in real-world cases in Thailand [20] and South Korea [21], where the nanogrids are formed for a lighting road system and distribution substations, respectively.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The significance of these results lies in providing support for policy-maker decisions that can promote the decentralized and renewable generation model. The same indication regarding how the costs of BESS push nanogrid payback indicators further is found in real-world cases in Thailand [20] and South Korea [21], where the nanogrids are formed for a lighting road system and distribution substations, respectively.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…P PV (kW) corresponds to the power generated from a single PV panel. The η PV is then modified such that it includes the PV panel efficiency under standard temperature conditions (η STC ) and the loss in PV power due to higher cell temperatures (η temp ), and the degradation factor (η degradation ) is assumed to be 80% [55].…”
Section: Pv System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Num max represents the maximum number of crossings. Individual P i can be expressed in the form of real number matrix, as shown in formula (10) [26], [27], [28].…”
Section: Optimization Based On Improved Psomentioning
confidence: 99%